Cited by 64Philosophy and History of ScienceComplex Systems and DynamicsCellular Automata and Applications

How causal analysis can reveal autonomy in models of biological systems

Open access
Marshall, William, Kim, Hyunju, Walker, Sara I., Tononi, Giulio, Albantakis, Larissa·2017·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Standard techniques for studying biological systems largely focus on their dynamical or, more recently, their informational properties, usually taking either a reductionist or holistic perspective. Yet, studying only individual system elements or the dynamics of the system as a whole disregards the organizational structure of the system—whether there are subsets of elements with joint causes or effects, and whether the system is strongly integrated or composed of several loosely interacting components. Integrated information theory offers a theoretical framework to (1) investigate the compositional cause–effect structure of a system and to (2) identify causal borders of highly integrated elements comprising local maxima of intrinsic cause–effect power. Here we apply this comprehensive causal analysis to a Boolean network model of the fission yeast ( Schizosaccharomyces pombe ) cell cycle. We demonstrate that this biological model features a non-trivial causal architecture, whose discovery may provide insights about the real cell cycle that could not be gained from holistic or reductionist approaches. We also show how some specific properties of this underlying causal architecture relate to the biological notion of autonomy. Ultimately, we suggest that analysing the causal organization of a system, including key features like intrinsic control and stable causal borders, should prove relevant for distinguishing life from non-life, and thus could also illuminate the origin of life problem. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Reconceptualizing the origins of life’.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2016.0358

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IIT-based models of metabolic cycles and gene-regulatory networks suggest that adaptive capacities of biotic systems may require high-phi configurations.

    “Notably, IIT-based models of metabolic cycles and gene-regulatory networks—core processes for homeostasis and autopoiesis—suggest that adaptive capacities of biotic systems may require high-phi configurations (Marshall et al., 2017; Abrego and Zaikin, 2019).”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Marshall et al., 2017

    The Boolean network model and Discussion report that IIT analysis found an integrated, self-regulating fission yeast cell-cycle network with self-maintained causal borders. They do not study metabolic cycles or establish that adaptive capacities generally require high-Φ configurations; the paper also notes that the cell-cycle function can be reproduced by a backbone network that is not integrated. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]18. Pearl J. 2009 Causality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marshall, W., Kim, H., Walker, S. I., Tononi, G., & Albantakis, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Albantakis, Larissa
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2017-11-13
Volume
375
Issue
2109
Pages
20160358
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W2753865463
Cited by
64
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
40.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Templeton World Charities Foundation (TWCF 0067/AB41)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Cellular Automata and Applications
Keywords
integrated information theory, causal architecture, biological autonomy, Boolean networks, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, cell cycle, origin of life
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, Models, Biological, Schizosaccharomyces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review