Cited by 42Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

Problematic internet use is associated with structural alterations in the brain reward system in females

Altbäcker, Anna, Plózer, Enikő, Darnai, Gergely, Perlaki, Gábor, Horváth, Réka, Orsi, Gergely, Nagy, Szilvia Anett, Bogner, Péter +5 more·2016·Brain Imaging and Behavior

Abstract

Neuroimaging findings suggest that excessive Internet use shows functional and structural brain changes similar to substance addiction. Even though it is still under debate whether there are gender differences in case of problematic use, previous studies by-passed this question by focusing on males only or by using gender matched approach without controlling for potential gender effects. We designed our study to find out whether there are structural correlates in the brain reward system of problematic Internet use in habitual Internet user females. T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance (MR) images were collected in 82 healthy habitual Internet user females. Structural brain measures were investigated using both automated MR volumetry and voxel based morphometry (VBM). Self-reported measures of problematic Internet use and hours spent online were also assessed. According to MR volumetry, problematic Internet use was associated with increased grey matter volume of bilateral putamen and right nucleus accumbens while decreased grey matter volume of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Similarly, VBM analysis revealed a significant negative association between the absolute amount of grey matter OFC and problematic Internet use. Our findings suggest structural brain alterations in the reward system usually related to addictions are present in problematic Internet use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11682-015-9454-9

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internet addiction is associated with increased grey matter volume in the bilateral putamen and right nucleus accumbens and decreased grey matter volume in the orbitofrontal cortex.

    “Internet addiction has increased grey matter volume in the bilateral putamen and right nucleus accumbens and decreased grey matter volume in the orbitofrontal cortex, a part of the prefrontal cortex [31].”

    From Social Media Algorithms and Teen Addiction: Neurophysiological Impact and Ethical Considerations (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Discussion (p. 9) reports the stated increases in grey matter volume in the bilateral putamen and right nucleus accumbens and decrease in the orbitofrontal cortex. However, the study examined associations with problematic Internet use in a non-clinical sample of habitual Internet-user females (Introduction, p. 4), not diagnosed Internet addiction generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Andersson JL, Jenkinson M, Smith S. Non-linear registration, aka Spatial normalisation FMRIB technical report TR07JA2. FMRIB Analysis Group of the University of Oxford 2007 .
  2. Maguire EA, Woollett K, Spiers HJ (2006) London taxi drivers and bus drivers: a structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis. Hippocampus 16:1091-1101. http://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20233 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altbäcker, A., Plózer, E., Darnai, G., Perlaki, G., Horváth, R., Orsi, G., Nagy, S. A., Bogner, P., Schwarcz, A., Kovács, N., Komoly, S., Clemens, Z., & Janszky, J.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology (HU)
  • University of Pecs (HU)
  • Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HU)
  • Országos Idegsebészeti Tudományos Intézet (HU)
Corresponding author
Altbäcker, Anna
Venue
Brain Imaging and Behavior
Published
2015-09-23
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
953-959
ISSN
  • 1931-7557 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-7565
OpenAlex
W1790528258
Cited by
42
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Imaging and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
problematic internet use, internet addiction, brain reward system, gray matter volume, orbitofrontal cortex, putamen, nucleus accumbens, sex differences, voxel-based morphometry, volumetric MRI
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Organ Size, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Young Adult, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review