Cited by 42Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

Does Rumination Function as a Longitudinal Mediator Between Mindfulness and Depression?

Jury, Tasmin K., Jose, Paul E.·2019·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-018-1031-z

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jury, T. K., & Jose, P. E.
Affiliations
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Corresponding author
Jose, Paul E.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2018-11-27
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
1091-1104
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2903039523
Cited by
42
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
Marsden Fund (06080611)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
rumination, depression, depressive symptoms, longitudinal mediation, mindfulness facets, non-judgment, acting with awareness, non-clinical adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review