The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 84 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task?
Open accessAbstract
Mobile technologies are being used to deliver health behavior interventions. The study aims to determine how health behavior theories are applied to mobile interventions. This is a review of the theoretical basis and interactivity of mobile health behavior interventions. Many of the mobile health behavior interventions reviewed were predominately one way (i.e., mostly data input or informational output), but some have leveraged mobile technologies to provide just-in-time, interactive, and adaptive interventions. Most smoking and weight loss studies reported a theoretical basis for the mobile intervention, but most of the adherence and disease management studies did not. Mobile health behavior intervention development could benefit from greater application of health behavior theories. Current theories, however, appear inadequate to inform mobile intervention development as these interventions become more interactive and adaptive. Dynamic feedback system theories of health behavior can be developed utilizing longitudinal data from mobile devices and control systems engineering models.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
51 Not checked yet · 40 Own interpretation · 23 No basis given · 15 Own result · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Not supported · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“With the exception of the Rodgers intervention [24, 29], these mobile smoking cessation interventions provided a theoretical basis, citing Social Cognitive Theory, Self-Regulation Theory, the Transtheoretical Model, and cognitive–behavioral theory.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Smoking cessation
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [24] Rodgers, A., Corbett, T., Bramley, D., et al. (2005). Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomized trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging. Tobacco Control, 14, 255–261. source
The Interventions section describes Rodgers’s mobile text-message smoking-cessation programme, so the paper identifies the intervention named as the exception. It mentions cognitive behavioural therapy expertise, and the References list includes a transtheoretical-therapy paper, but the intervention description does not state a named theory as its basis. This source does not establish which theories the other interventions cited. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [29] Free, C., Whittaker, R., Knight, R., Abramsky, T., Rodgers, A., & Roberts, G. (2009). Txt2stop: A pilot randomized controlled trial of mobile phone-based smoking cessation support. Tobacco Control, 18, 88–91. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Background (p. 3) identifies Rodgers’s STOMP trial, and ‘The interventions’ (p. 4) describes txt2stop as drawing on effective components identified in systematic reviews rather than naming a theory. The paper does not establish that Rodgers’s intervention lacked a theoretical basis, or address whether the other interventions cited social cognitive, self-regulation, transtheoretical, or cognitive–behavioral theories. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most smoking and weight loss studies reported a theoretical basis for the mobile intervention”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of the mobile health behavior interventions reviewed were predominately one way (i.e., mostly data input or informational output)”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but some have leveraged mobile technologies to provide just-in-time, interactive, and adaptive interventions.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but most of the adherence and disease management studies did not.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 12 studies summarized in Table 2, seven specified a theoretical basis for the mobile weight loss, diet, or physical activity intervention developed.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Weight loss, diet, and physical activity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of the interventions were computer-tailored at treatment initiation.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Smoking cessation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seven studies were identified that used mobile technology to deliver smoking cessation interventions.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Smoking cessation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identified 12 studies reporting on mobile health behavior interventions for weight loss, diet, and/or physical activity.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Weight loss, diet, and physical activity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we identified 20 studies: 16 in diabetes management, three in asthma management, and one in hypertension management (Table 4).”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Disease management
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 38
- Probably not a substantial claim. 27
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“In this review, only a few studies adjusted the timing of the interventions, usually during the transition from behavior change to maintenance (e.g., [23, 40]), but these timing adjustments were set a priori across all participants and were not dynamically determined at the individual level.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Obermayer, J. L., Riley, W. T., Asif, O., & Jean-Mary, J. (2004). College smoking-cessation using cell phone text messaging. J Amer Coll Health, 53, 71–78. source
- Disputedcites [40] Haapala, I., Barengo, N. C., Biggs, S., Surakka, L., & Manninen, P. (2009). Weight loss by mobile phone: A 1-year effectiveness study. Public Health Nutrition, 12, 2382–2391. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 2 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Other methodological considerations for adaptive interactive technologies applied to eHealth also may be appropriate to consider for mHealth interventions [107, 108].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [107] O’Grady, L., Witteman, H., Bender, J. L., Urowitz, S., Wiljer, D., & Jaded, A. R. (2009). Measuring the impact of a moving target: Towards a dynamic framework for evaluating collaborative adaptive interactive technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11, e20. source
The Results describe flexible, iterative, user- and context-focused approaches to evaluating adaptive, interactive eHealth technologies. The Discussion’s “Technology” section explicitly includes mobile phones among the devices to consider when evaluating platform portability. Together, these passages support the cautious suggestion that such considerations may be relevant to mHealth interventions; the paper does not claim to test their application to mHealth. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites [108] Resnicow, K., Strecher, V., Couper, M., et al. (2010). Methodologic and design issues in patient-centered e-health research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38, 98–102. source
The Introduction describes methodological approaches for studying how, why, and for whom e-health interventions work, and explicitly includes interventions delivered by PDAs and cell phones. The Conclusion recommends applying these design and analytic approaches to future e-health research. This supports the cautious suggestion that the considerations may also be relevant to mHealth interventions. (LLM, conf=0.90)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the seven studies identified are from three research groups who developed and evaluated interventions delivered via mobile phone text messaging (aka short messaging service (SMS)).”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Smoking cessation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Consistent with the more general weight loss intervention literature, Social Cognitive Theory was the primary theoretical basis for these interventions although the Theory of Planned Behavior was cited by one study [38].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Weight loss, diet, and physical activity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] Hurling, R., Catt, M., De Boni, M., et al. (2007). Using Internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9, e7. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Compared to controls, those in the mobile phone intervention lost significantly more weight (4.5 vs. 1.1 kg) and had a greater reduction in waist circumference (6.3 vs. 2.4 cm) after 1 year in the program.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Weight loss, diet, and physical activity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Haapala, I., Barengo, N. C., Biggs, S., Surakka, L., & Manninen, P. (2009). Weight loss by mobile phone: A 1-year effectiveness study. Public Health Nutrition, 12, 2382–2391. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of these interventions also adjusted just-in-time via text message requests from users for assistance which generated immediate return text messages with tips and strategies to manage urges or withdrawal.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Smoking cessation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Quit rates from the interventions evaluated in these studies range from 8% [29] to 53% [26] with a follow-up period ranging from 4 weeks to 12 months.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Smoking cessation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Free, C., Whittaker, R., Knight, R., Abramsky, T., Rodgers, A., & Roberts, G. (2009). Txt2stop: A pilot randomized controlled trial of mobile phone-based smoking cessation support. Tobacco Control, 18, 88–91. source
- Not checked yetcites [26] Whittaker, R., Maddison, R., McRobbie, H., et al. (2008). A multimedia mobile phone-based youth smoking cessation intervention: Findings from content development and piloting studies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10, e49. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of these, eight targeted medical appointment adherence and two addressed medication adherence, specifically HIV treatment adherence.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Treatment adherence
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although weight loss in the text messaging condition was modest over 4 months (2.88 kg), it was significantly greater than in the print only condition.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Weight loss, diet, and physical activity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Patrick, K., Raab, F., Adams, M. A., et al. (2009). A text message-based intervention for weight loss: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11, e1. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is important to note, however, that only two studies used randomized controls [58, 59]; the others used historical or nonrandomized controls.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Treatment adherence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] Leong, K. C., Leong, K. W., Mastura, I., et al. (2006). The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: A randomized controlled trial. Family Practice, 23, 699–705. source
- Not checked yetcites [59] Chen, Z. W., Fang, L. Z., Chen, L. Y., & Dai, H. L. (2008). Comparison of an SMS text messaging and phone reminder to improve attendance at a health promotion center: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Zhejiang University. Science B, 9, 34–38. source
plainn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although video input has been primarily used for telemedicine purposes [78, 79], health behavior researchers have begun to use cameras for dietary assessment [48].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78] Chung, P., Yu, T., & Scheinfeld, N. (2007). Using cellphones for teledermatology, a preliminary study. Dermatology Online Journal, 13, 2. source
- Not checked yetcites [79] Tang, F. H., Law, M. Y., Lee, A. C., & Chan, L. W. (2004). A mobile phone integrated health care delivery system for medical images. Journal of Digital Imaging, 17, 217–225. source
- Not checked yetcites [48] Boushey, C. J., Kerr, D. A., Wright, J., Lutes, K. D., Ebert, D. S., & Delp, E. J. (2009). Use of technology in children’s dietary assessment. Euro J Clin Nutr., 63, S50–S57. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to voice, text, and data inputs, researchers have begun to use video input via camera features on these phones.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Outcomes from the mobile disease management studies were generally positive and statistically significant.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Disease management
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Much of the mobile health behavior interventions to date have focused on transmitting data from glucometers and spirometers”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A few studies have used other output functions such as audio (e.g., [35]) or video (e.g. [26])”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Liu, W. T., Wang, C. H., Lin, H. C., et al. (2008). Efficacy of a cell phone-based exercise programme for COPD. The European Respiratory Journal, 32, 651–659. source
- Not checked yetcites [26] Whittaker, R., Maddison, R., McRobbie, H., et al. (2008). A multimedia mobile phone-based youth smoking cessation intervention: Findings from content development and piloting studies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10, e49. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the mobile interventions described in this review used text messaging (aka SMS) functionality of mobile phones.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As with input, most of the output delivery to date has been via text messaging.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Following input, some applications provided tailored intervention responses, but others failed to deliver even a confirmation message”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most of the smoking and weight loss mobile interventions provided some form of “just-in-time” response based on a prior input, but the frequency or intensity of interactivity varied substantially among these interventions”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Obermayer, J. L., Riley, W. T., Asif, O., & Jean-Mary, J. (2004). College smoking-cessation using cell phone text messaging. J Amer Coll Health, 53, 71–78. source
- Not checked yetcites [27] Brendryen, H., & Kraft, P. (2008). Happy Ending: A randomized controlled trial of a digital multi-media smoking cessation intervention. Addiction, 103, 478–484. source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Burke, L. E., Conroy, M. B., Sereika, S. M., et al. (2011). The effect of electronic self-monitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: A randomized behavioral weight loss trial. Obesity, 19, 338–344. source
- Not checked yetcites [43] Patrick, K., Raab, F., Adams, M. A., et al. (2009). A text message-based intervention for weight loss: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11, e1. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“None of the adherence interventions made just-in-time adjustments, but most of these interventions were single prompt appointment reminders with no longitudinal basis for adjustment, and none obtained the input necessary to make treatment adjustments.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“these theories and models have been used with considerable success to tailor health behavior interventions based on pre-intervention factors, but typically have not been used to adapt the intervention to the individual over the course of the intervention [88, 89].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Neville, L. M., O'Hara, B., & Milat, A. J. (2009). Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: A systematic review. Health Education Research, 24, 699–720. source
- Not checked yetcites [89] Lustria, M. L., Cortese, J., Noar, S. M., & Glueckauf, R. L. (2009). Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: Review and analysis of key components. Patient Education and Counseling, 74, 156–173. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Disease management and weight loss mobile health interventions have relied predominately on input while adherence and smoking cessation mobile health interventions have relied predominately on output.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The disease management interventions also typically provided just-in-time intervention adjustments, but most relied on manual adjustments by a health care professional to do so.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, only a subset of mobile health behavior interventions have been theory-based”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most theories of health behavior change to date have focused on mean levels of predictive variables, but with the advent of newer data technologies, we can develop models that focus on lability or stability of key controlling factors.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“web-based health behavior interventions have proliferated in recent years and appear to be an efficacious method for delivering health behavior interventions in a cost-effective manner [1–3].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Webb, T. L., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., & Michie, S. (2010). Using the Internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12, e4. source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Tate, D. F., Finkelstein, E. A., Khavjou, O., & Gustafson, A. (2009). Cost effectiveness of Internet interventions: Review and recommendations. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 40–45. source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Norman, G. J., Zabinski, M. F., Adams, M. A., Rosenberg, D. E., Yaroch, A. L., & Atienza, A. A. (2007). A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, 336–345. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent Cochrane review of randomized studies of mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation, which included all of the randomized controlled trials (RCT) reviewed here, found a significant short-term increase in self-reported quitting (relative risk= 2.18; 95% confidence interval 1.80 to 2.65) but considerable heterogeneity and lack of sufficient evidence for long-term effects [32].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Smoking cessation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Whittaker, R., Borland, R., Bullen, C., Lin, R. B., McRobbie, H., & Rodgers, A. (2009). Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD006611.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“mobile phone use has been widely adopted across socioeconomic and demographic groups and appears greater among those populations most in need of these interventions [6, 7].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Pew Internet &American Life Project. (2010). http://www.pewInternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Mobile_Access_2010.pdf
- Not checked yetcites [7] Leena, K., Tomi, L., & Arja, R. (2005). Intensity of mobile phone use and health compromising behaviours: How is information and communication technology connected to health-related lifestyle in adolescence? Journal of Adolescence, 28, 35–47. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Lanzola and colleagues have proposed a multi-tier intervention model in which lower-tier disease management interventions are provided via automated treatment algorithms and higher tier interventions involving the healthcare provider occur only if the lower-tier interventions are ineffective [68].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Disease management
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [68] Lanzola, G., Capozzi, D., D’Annunzio, G., Ferrari, P., Bellazzi, R., & Larizza, C. (2007). Going mobile with a multi-access service for the management of diabetes patients. J Diabetes Sci Technol., 1, 730–737. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These manually adjusted interventions are consistent with telemedicine models, but they have limited scalability due to the provider burden required to review and deliver these interventions.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Disease management
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the ability of mobile disease management programs to assess patient status frequently and adjust treatment remotely appears to improve treatment outcomes and to serve as a basis for more comprehensive and automated mobile disease management interventions.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Disease management
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Strandbygaard et al. [77] found that the percent adherence based on objective inhaler dose counts decreased in the control condition (84.2% to 70.1%) but increased in the intervention condition (77.9% to 81.5%) over the 12-week study period.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Disease management
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [77] Strandbygaard, U., Thomsen, S. F., & Backer, V. (2010). A daily SMS reminder increases adherence to asthma treatment: A three-month follow-up study. Respiratory Medicine, 104, 166–171. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“device-resident or wireless Internet applications on smartphones provide a rich array of possible data and display outputs (e.g., progress charts, animation, videos, games) that could be used to deliver health behavior interventions.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the automatic transmission of testing data eliminates data entry burden, it does not eliminate the responsibility of the patient to perform regular testing”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > REVIEW OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS > Disease management
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“an expanding variety of sensor technologies can be used to assess physiological states, movement, location, and other variables using mobile phones.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the application of feedback control systems to current health behavior theory concepts provides not only potential theoretical models that are amenable to the time-intensive, interactive nature of mobile health behavior interventions but also theoretical models that are more consistent with the putative neurobiological and environmental processes that regulate these behaviors.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Boorsboom and colleagues have argued that between-person theories do not imply, test, or support causal accounts valid at the individual level [87].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Boorsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 202–219. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This work could serve as a basis for developing mobile technologies for diabetes management that take advantage of advanced closed-loop control system models to automate and better regulate blood glucose for insulin-dependent patients.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Text messaging reminders to attend appointments, take medications, exercise, etc. appear relatively straightforward and are consistent with the “cue to action” component of many health behavior theories”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adoption of dynamical system models for mobile health behavior interventions does not require that our current health behavior theories and models be discarded, but the predominately static, linear nature of these theories appears to be a poor fit with the intra-individual dynamics of future mobile technology interventions.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the history of health behavior theories cautions us about assuming that behavior change is straightforward or that innovative modes of delivery alone are sufficient to produce behavior change.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The potential of mobile technologies to generate the intensive longitudinal data sets reflecting the behavior of a smoker over time and observed in different settings and contexts is important for building a dynamical system model such as the individual smoking behavior model illustrated above.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Optimal feedback control systems have been applied to basic sensorimotor control [97] and to reinforcement learning models [98].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [97] Todorov, E. (2004). Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 907–915. source
- Not checked yetcites [98] Lewis, F. L., & Vamvoudakis, K. G. (2010). Reinforcement learning for partially observable dynamic processes: Adaptive dynamic programming using measured output data. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics, 41, 14–25. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Dunton and Atienza have noted that the increasing availability of time-intensive information (i.e., longitudinal data obtained at an intensive frequency) allows for the intra-individual tailoring of interventions but that current health behavior theories are based on delineating between, not within-person differences [86].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [86] Dunton and Atienza. (2009). The need for time-intensive information in healthful eating and physical activity research: A timely topic. JADA, 109(1), 30–35. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these feedback control systems have the potential to reshape health behavior theories and improve our understanding of human behavior.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“standard treatment algorithms can be used to automate, with 100% treatment fidelity, many of these treatment adjustments, greatly improving scalability, and reducing professional time and costs.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Standard treatment algorithms can automate many treatment adjustments with complete treatment fidelity.
In the paper
“These theories do not preclude the possibility that some conceptual components change over time, and some concepts such as reciprocal determinism in Social Cognitive Theory are explicitly dynamic in nature [14].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Some have argued that these theories are inadequate even for traditional interventions [17]”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Ogden, J. (2003). Some problems with social cognition models: A pragmatic and conceptual analysis. Health Psychology, 22, 424–428. source
hedged- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but this may be the result of reliance on evidence based clinical guidelines (e.g., diabetes management) or on the simplicity of the intervention delivered (e.g., appointment reminders).”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As a result, we did not report on recent mobile intervention development from proof-of-concept (e.g., [82]), usability/feasibility (e.g., [83]), or ongoing research reports (e.g., [84])”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82] Skevofilakas, M., Mougiakakou, S. G., Zarkogianni, K., et al. (2007). A communication and information technology infrastructure for real-time monitoring and management of type 1 diabetes patients. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc., 2007, 3685–3686.
- Not checked yetcites [83] Holtz, B., & Whitten, P. (2009). Managing asthma with mobile phones: A feasibility study. Telemed J E Health., 15, 907–909. source
- Not checked yetcites [84] Ryan, D., Pinnock, H., Lee, A. J., et al. (2009). The CYMPLA trial. Mobile phone-based structured intervention to achieve asthma control in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Primary Care Respiratory Journal, 18, 343–345. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To insure that the mobile interventions reviewed were mature enough for actual use, we limited our review to studies that subjected these interventions to some form of clinical outcome assessment.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > SUMMARY OF MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION FEATURES
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The use of these control technologies in a smoking cessation intervention as shown in Fig. 1 parallels the closed-loop control system for diabetes management described previously.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Novel dynamic health behavior theories and their application to health behavior interventions via mobile technologies will require empirical validation.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The optimization process leads to specific intervention decisions (u2(t)) for providing behavioral strategies and/or medication prompts to replace smoking as a means of reducing smoking urge.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Health behavior interventions delivered via mobile technologies offer not only the impetus to transform our current theories into more dynamic feedback control models but also the potential to provide the intensive longitudinal data necessary to test and improve our theoretical intervention models.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ability to provide frequent, time-intensive interventions in the context of the behavior holds considerable promise but also poses many challenges to our current health behavior theories and models.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Adaptive treatment methodologies has been applied to interventions that adjust over the course of weeks or months, not hours or days, but these methodologies can be applied to mobile technology interventions [106].”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Bierman, K. L. (2004). A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 5, 185–196. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a theory-driven iterative model of mobile intervention development holds promise for improving not only our mobile health behavior interventions but also our theoretical and empirical understanding of health behavior change.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These modeling techniques also can be applied to reverse-engineer the functional relationship underlying the urge controller which reflects the actions of an individual smoker.”
§ Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? > THEORETICAL BASIS FOR MOBILE HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND NEW DIRECTIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
The absence of a reported theoretical basis in a study indicates that the intervention was not actually based on theory.
“Most smoking and weight loss studies reported a theoretical basis for the mobile intervention, but most of the adherence and disease management studies did not.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Health behavior theories can improve the outcomes of mobile health behavior interventions.
“Mobile health behavior intervention development could benefit from greater application of health behavior theories.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The reviewed studies are representative of mobile health behavior interventions in the four areas covered by the review.
“Nearly all of the articles identified meeting these criteria fell into one of four major health behavior areas: smoking, weight loss (including diet and exercise interventions), treatment adherence (i.e., adherence to medical recommendations including both taking medication and attending appointments), and chronic disease management.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Bluetooth-enabled glucometers eliminate the need for patients to manually enter data.
“With the advent of Bluetooth-enabled glucometers, data entry burden is eliminated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Text messages can be delivered simply and inexpensively across mobile phone operating platforms and to a large percentage of mobile phone users.
“Text messages can be delivered simply and inexpensively across mobile phone operating platforms and to a large percentage of mobile phone users given the ubiquitous nature of this feature even on “less smart” mobile phones.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Standard treatment algorithms can automate many treatment adjustments with complete treatment fidelity.
“standard treatment algorithms can be used to automate, with 100% treatment fidelity, many of these treatment adjustments”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the 1950s, mobile neighborhood tuberculosis screenings did not substantially increase screenings despite added salience and convenience.
“In the 1950s, mobile neighborhood tuberculosis screenings were innovative, but the added salience and convenience did not substantially increase screenings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Perceived threat, perceived benefit, and perceived barriers contributed to whether a person obtained tuberculosis screenings.
“the perceived threat (severity and susceptibility) of tuberculosis, the perceived benefit of being screened, and the perceived barriers to getting screened contributed to a person obtaining these screenings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Control systems engineering principles and procedures are mature and provide a robust computational framework for modeling, simulation, and systematic decision making over time.
“Control systems engineering principles and procedures are mature and provide a robust computational framework for modeling, simulation, and systematic decision making over time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Feedback regulatory processes are central to neurobiology.
“Feedback regulatory processes are core to neurobiology.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The brain regulates itself and other organs using feedback control processes.
“Since the brain appears to regulate itself and other organs using feedback control processes”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Smoking urge can be modeled as an inventory built up by negative emotional and external stimuli and depleted by smoking and positive affect or intervention components.
“Using a fluid analogy, smoking urge is accumulated as an inventory that is built up by an “inflow” of negative emotional stimuli (e.g., sadness, irritation) and external stimuli (e.g., presence of others smoking, drinking coffee) and depleted by an urge “outflow” resulting from smoking events and the salutary effects of positive affect and dosages of intervention components such as medications and”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The inherent dynamics of smoking behavior form a closed-loop feedback system.
“The inherent dynamics of smoking behavior in Fig. 1 constitutes a closed-loop feedback system”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, mobile technology interventions informed by strategies, such as health behavior theory, hold the potential for more comprehensive mechanisms of behavior change, fostering a health care approach that is both impactful and sustainable [27].”
From Assessing the Effectiveness of Digital Health Behavior Strategies on Type 2 Diabetes Management: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Interventions delivered via mobile phones facilitate frequent engagement as users go about their daily lives [12,13] and afford users the opportunity to apply the skills and behaviors promoted by the intervention directly in real time to their real life experiences [14].”
From Feasibility of "CopeSmart": A Telemental Health App for Adolescents (2015) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“However, a growing number of investigators have recognized that current theoretical models are inadequate to inform the development of BITs that can increasingly interact dynamically and adaptively with users (77).”
From Behavioral Intervention Technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health (2013) · cites this paper as [77]
In the citing paper
“Behavioral theories have classically been how behavioral sciences describe how interventions, individuals, and context interact but these are fraught with well-documented problems such as lack of falsification, lack of information about subtle dynamics, and they are often so abstract that they are difficult to apply in practice [36, 37].”
From Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world (2016) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, and with regard to its structure, it is suitable for implementation in digital health interventions [37-40].”
From Mobile Sensing and Support for People With Depression: A Pilot Trial in the Wild (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“While these models are useful in describing the types of behavioral and cognitive changes required of users in their environments to achieve clinical targets, they offer little information on how to design and implement BITs to ensure that they are useful and usable [1].”
From The Behavioral Intervention Technology Model: An Integrated Conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions (2014) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“While these models are useful in describing the types of behavioral and cognitive changes required of users in their environments to achieve clinical targets, they offer little information on how to design and implement BITs to ensure that they are useful and usable [1].”
From The Behavioral Intervention Technology Model: An Integrated Conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions (2014) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“A growing number of investigators have commented on the lack of models informing the design of behavioral intervention technologies (BITs) [1].”
From The Behavioral Intervention Technology Model: An Integrated Conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions (2014) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“This would help avoid the all-too-common process of developing BITs that ignore psychological or engineering principles or that rely entirely on developer intuition [1,3].”
From The Behavioral Intervention Technology Model: An Integrated Conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions (2014) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Much of the development of BITs to date has been informed primarily through the application of behavioral and psychological theories and by developer intuition [1].”
From The Behavioral Intervention Technology Model: An Integrated Conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions (2014) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
System Identification: Theory for the User
Lennart Ljung, A. (1987) · Cited by 17,690
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510
The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change.
Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 · Cited by 7,782
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model
Rosenstock, I. M. (1974) · Health Education Monographs · doi:10.1177/109019817400200403 · Cited by 6,116
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
(2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_436 · Cited by 4,552
Moral Identity and Developmental Theory
Lapsley, D. K. (2015) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000435926 · Cited by 3,843
Lee, J. H., Kaisare, N. S., & García, C. E. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394333325.fmatter · Cited by 3,766
The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of its Applications to Health-Related Behaviors
Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87 · Cited by 3,185
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Prue, D. M., Riley, A., Orlandi, M. A., & Jerome, A. (1990). Development of a computer-assisted smoking cessation program: A preliminary report. J Adv Med., 3, 131–139.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps
Stoyanov, S. R., Hides, L., Kavanagh, D. J., Zelenko, O., Tjondronegoro, D., & Mani, M. (2015) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3422 · Cited by 2,233
“The use of mobile apps for health and well being promotion has grown exponentially in recent years [1].”
BackgroundNahum-Shani, I., Smith, S. N., Spring, B. J., Collins, L. M., Witkiewitz, K., Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8 · Cited by 2,171
“sary to develop efficacious JITAIs and decide whether a JITAI is warranted in a particular setting [10].”
BackgroundLeventhal, H., Phillips, L. A., & Burns, E. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2 · Cited by 1,350
Mobile Health Technology Evaluation
Kumar, S., Nilsen, W. J., Abernethy, A., Atienza, A., Patrick, K., Pavel, M., Riley, W. T., Shar, A., Spring, B., Spruijt-Metz, D., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017 · Cited by 900
“This is a multi-step process that: (1) defines the classification problem; (2) divides the annotated data set into training and validation data sets; (3) decides what machine-learning classifiers will be tested (e.”
BackgroundSelf-citationMohr, D. C., Burns, M. N., Schueller, S. M., Clarke, G., & Klinkman, M. (2013) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.008 · Cited by 693
“users [77].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Riley, W. T., Rivera, D. E., Atienza, A. A., Nilsen, W., Allison, S. M., & Mermelstein, R.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Riley, William T
- ORCID
- Venue
- Translational Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-02-24
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-71
- ISSN
- 1613-9860 (ISSN-L)
- 1869-6716
- PMC
- PMC3142960
- OpenAlex
- W2086310388
- Cited by
- 978
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 98 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Translational Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA024266, K25DA021173)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- mobile health intervention, health behavior theory, just-in-time adaptive interventions, interactive intervention, smoking cessation, weight loss, medication adherence, disease management, control engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review