Cited by 338Frailty in Older AdultsNutrition and Health in AgingBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Benefits of resistance training in physically frail elderly: a systematic review

Lopez, Pedro, Pinto, Ronei Silveira, Radaelli, Regis, Rech, Anderson, Grazioli, Rafael, Izquierdo, Mikel, Cadore, Eduardo Lusa·2018·Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

Aim Exercise is one of the most important components in frailty prevention and treatment. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the effect of resistance training (RT) alone or combined with multimodal exercise intervention on muscle hypertrophy, maximal strength, power output, functional performance, and falls incidence in physically frail elderly.Methods MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, PEDro, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from 2005 to 2017. Studies must have mentioned the effects of RT (i.e., included or not in multimodal training) on at least one of the following parameters: muscle mass, muscle strength, muscle power, functional capacity, and risk of falls in frail elderly.Results The initial search identified 371 studies and 16 were used for qualitative analysis for describing the effect of strength training performed alone or in a multimodal exercise intervention. We observed that RT alone or in a multimodal training may induce increases of 6.6-37% in maximal strength; 3.4-7.5% in muscle mass, 8.2% in muscle power, 4.7-58.1% in functional capacity and risk of falls, although some studies did not show enhancements.Conclusion Frequency of 1-6 sessions per week, training volume of 1-3 sets of 6-15 repetitions and intensity of 30-70%1-RM promoted significant enhancements on muscle strength, muscle power, and functional outcomes. Therefore, in agreement with previous studies, we suggest that supervised and controlled RT represents an effective intervention in frailty treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40520-017-0863-z

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez, P., Pinto, R. S., Radaelli, R., Rech, A., Grazioli, R., Izquierdo, M., & Cadore, E. L.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Venue
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Published
2017-11-29
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
889-899
ISSN
  • 1594-0667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1720-8319
OpenAlex
W2768606470
Cited by
338
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
resistance training, frailty, older adults, muscle strength, muscle power, muscle hypertrophy, functional capacity, falls, multimodal training, exercise frequency, training volume, exercise intensity, supervised exercise intervention
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Humans, Exercise, Frail Elderly, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review