Cited by 388Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice

Atkinson, Robert K., Mayer, Richard E., Merrill, Mary Margaret·2005·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.07.001

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E., & Merrill, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Louisiana State University in Shreveport (US)
Corresponding author
Atkinson, Robert K.
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
117-139
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164725482
Cited by
388
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
animated agents, worked examples, proportional reasoning, transfer of learning, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review