Cited by 59Impact of Technology on AdolescentsInnovations in Medical EducationSocial Media in Health Education

The use of technology by youth: implications for psychiatric educators.

Open access
Joshi, Shashank V., Stubbe, Dorothy, Li, Su-Ting T., Hilty, Donald M.·2019·Academic Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40596-018-1007-2

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joshi, S. V., Stubbe, D., Li, S.-T. T., & Hilty, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • VA Northern California Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Hilty, Donald M.
Venue
Academic Psychiatry
Published
2018-11-16
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
101-109
ISSN
  • 1042-9670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7230
OpenAlex
W2900939487
Cited by
59
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
youth technology use, digital technologies, psychiatric training, adolescent mental health, educational implications
MeSH terms
Cyberbullying, Screen Time, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Diffusion of Innovation, Education, Medical, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatry, Risk-Taking, Technology, Behavior, Addictive, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review