Cited by 75Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSleep and related disordersChild Development and Digital Technology

The relationship between sleep and problematic smartphone use among adolescents: A systematic review

Mac Cárthaigh, Saoirse, Griffin, Claire, Perry, John·2020·Developmental Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dr.2020.100897

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 155 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mac Cárthaigh, S., Griffin, C., & Perry, J.
Affiliations
University of Limerick (IE)
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
55
Pages
100897
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008834823
Cited by
75
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
sleep, smartphone addiction, adolescents, sleep quality, sleep duration, mobile devices, screen time, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review