The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Decisions tend to be more accurate if subjects are given longer exposure to a stimulus (Green and Luce, 1973;Wickelgren, 1977;Gold and Shadlen, 2000;Mateeff et al., 2000)”
From Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task (2002) · cites this paper as Wickelgren, 1977
In the citing paper
“There is often a tradeoff between speed and accuracy: performance improves with slower response times (Wickelgren, 1977).”
From Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits (2008) · cites this paper as Wickelgren, 1977
Citations
Cites
High-speed scanning in human memory
Sternberg, S. (1966) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.153.3736.652 · Cited by 3,576
On the Rate of Gain of Information
Hick, W. E. (1952) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470215208416600 · Cited by 2,279
Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments.
Sternberg, S. (1969) · PubMed · Cited by 1,943
THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT
Woodworth, R. S. (1899) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0092992 · Cited by 1,747
THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT
Woodworth, R. S. (1899) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-189912000-00005 · Cited by 1,352
The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1
Pachella, R. G. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003176688-2 · Cited by 745
Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory
Reed, A. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.181.4099.574 · Cited by 377
Cognitive aspects of information processing: III. Set for speed versus accuracy.
Fitts, P. M. (1966) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0023232 · Cited by 319
Schouten, J. F., & Bekker, J. (1967) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(67)90054-6 · Cited by 304
List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory
Reed, A. V. (1976) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03213250 · Cited by 228
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Garrett, 1922, A study on the relation of accuracy to speed, Archives of Psychology, 56, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
Selective phonotaxis of female crickets under natural outdoor conditions
Hirtenlehner, S., & Römer, H. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-014-0881-7 · Cited by 36
“…outcome of male–male interactions (Dadour and Bailey 1985; Latimer and Schatral 1986) and for preferences exhibited by females in a two-choice situation (Shuvalov and Popov 1973; Gwynne 1982; Doherty 1985; Latimer and Sippel 1987; Bailey and Yeoh 1988; Weber and Thorson 1988; Bailey et al. 1990).”
BackgroundRegional effects of clutter on human target detection performance
Asher, M., Tolhurst, D. J., Troscianko, T., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2013) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/13.5.25 · Cited by 36
How users interact with a 3D geo-browser under time pressure
Wilkening, J., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2013) · Cartography and Geographic Information Science · doi:10.1080/15230406.2013.762140 · Cited by 35
“…outside of cartography have shown that time pressure can have a negative effect on the quality of the decision-making such as, response accuracy (Maule and Edland 1997; Wickelgren 1977), and response con fi dence in decisions made without maps (Maule 1998; Maule and Andrade 1997; Smith et al. 1982).”
BackgroundLoTemplio, S. B., Silcox, J. W., Federmeier, K. D., & Payne, B. R. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13758 · Cited by 36
Choice selective inhibition drives stability and competition in decision circuits
Roach, J. P., Churchland, A. K., & Engel, T. A. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-35822-8 · Cited by 37
Yazidi, A., Mofrad, A. A., Goodwin, M., Hammer, H. L., & Arntzen, E. (2020) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-020-09624-3 · Cited by 35
“Accuracy and response time, however, trade against each other (Fitts 1966; Wickelgren 1977) and both must be considered in a welldefined and standard task difficulty measure.”
BackgroundCurvilinear dependency of response accuracy on response time in cognitive tests
Chen, H., de Boeck, P. A. L., Grady, M., Yang, C., & Waldschmidt, D. M. (2018) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.04.001 · Cited by 38
Alexander, P. A. (2020) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.331 · Cited by 35
Toward a model-based cognitive neuroscience of mind wandering
Hawkins, G. E., Mittner, M., Boekel, W., Heathcote, A., & Forstmann, B. U. (2015) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.09.053 · Cited by 35
“The well-known speed-accuracy tradeoff, for example, describes how one can make faster decisions at the expense of accuracy, and vice versa (Reed, 1973; Pachella, 1974; Wickelgren, 1977).”
Grubb, M. A., White, A. L., Heeger, D. J., & Carrasco, M. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0698-y · Cited by 35
“These behavioral studies are difficult to interpret because they used changes in response time (RT) to index attention, which can reflect changes in speed of processing, discriminability or decision criteria (Reed 1973; Wickelgren 1977).”
InfluentialMurdock, B. B. (1982) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-566760-9.50006-3 · Cited by 35
Bromocriptine Does Not Alter Speed–Accuracy Tradeoff
Winkel, J., van Maanen, L., Ratcliff, R., van der Schaaf, M. E., van Schouwenburg, M. R., Cools, R., & Forstmann, B. U. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00126 · Cited by 34
“One important aspect of making a decision is the speed–accuracy tradeoff (SAT; Wickelgren, 1977): making a decision quickly comes at the expense of being accurate, and vice versa.”
Backgroundvan Maanen, L., Katsimpokis, D., & van Campen, A. D. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1110-z · Cited by 34
“The focus on response speed typically comes at the cost of making more errors, which are evenly distributed across the RT distribution (Heitz, 2014; Schouten & Bekker, 1967; Van Maanen et al., 2011; Wickelgren, 1977).”
BackgroundLiesefeld, H. R., & Janczyk, M. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01843-2 · Cited by 31
“…Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 18, D-28359 Bremen, Germany 1 3 where RT is mean RT, δ is the x-offset, γ the steepness of the curve, and λ the PC asymptote (see Wickelgren, 1977; see also Usher & McClelland, 2001, and for a broader discussion, see Luce, 1986).”
BackgroundMethodPrevalence-based decisions undermine visual search
Schwark, J., MacDonald, J. A., Sandry, J. D., & Dolgov, I. (2013) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.811135 · Cited by 36
“It is unlikely that many decisions were made from actually perceiving targets given the well-established literature on speed accuracy tradeoffs (Schouten & Bekker, 1967; Wickelgren, 1977) and our finding that decisions made in the 96% condition were more accurate and faster.”
BackgroundControl Over the Time Course of Cognition in the Tempo-Naming Task.
Kello, C. T. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.942 · Cited by 34
When vying reveals lying: the timed antagonistic response alethiometer
Gregg, A. P. (2006) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1298 · Cited by 36
Erteschik‐Shir, N. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0016 · Cited by 33
Converging evidence for information-processing stages: A comparative-influence stage-analysis method
Salthouse, T. A. (1981) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(81)90038-x · Cited by 33
Constraints on information processing capacity in adults with ADHD.
Roberts, W., Milich, R. S., & Fillmore, M. T. (2012) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0030296 · Cited by 38
“However, this interpretation assumes that the n-back task is subject to a speed-accuracy trade-off (Wickelgren, 1977), and it is unclear whether using a slower and more cautious response style improves accuracy on this task.”
BackgroundGrasping Kinematics from the Perspective of the Individual Digits: A Modelling Study
Verheij, R., Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033150 · Cited by 32
“The reason for including the velocity in the equation is that human movements become more variable when the velocity increases [79,80].”
BackgroundThe Effects of Evidence Bounds on Decision-Making: Theoretical and Empirical Developments
Zhang, J. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00263 · Cited by 33
“FAST BOUNDARY MODULATION: SPEED–ACCURACY TRADEOFF The change in decision boundary provides a straightforward account of the speed–accuracy tradeoff (SAT) effect that is often observed in decision-making tasks (Schouten and Bekker, 1967; Wickelgren, 1977; Luce, 1986; Franks et al., 2003; Chittka et al., 2009).”
BackgroundCross-modal interaction between vision and hearing: A speed-accuracy analysis
Arieh, Y., & Marks, L. E. (2008) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/pp.70.3.412 · Cited by 33
“An SATF is generally characterized by its slope, intercept, and asymptote (Dosher, 1979; McElree, 2001; Wickelgren, 1977) or by its slope and intercept, if one considers only the region before the function asymptotes (Lappin & Disch, 1972a, 1972b, 1973).”
BackgroundDynamics of activation in semantic and episodic memory.
Yantis, S., & Meyer, D. E. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.117.2.130 · Cited by 33
Design and research potential of interactive textbooks: the case of fractions
Hoch, S., Reinhold, F., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. M. (2018) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-018-0971-z · Cited by 42
Effect of ethanol on judgments of performance
Tiplady, B., Franklin, N., & Scholey, A. B. (2004) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712604322779497 · Cited by 33
Task-dependent intensity/duration effects in mental chronometry
Wasserman, G. S. (1979) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00062646 · Cited by 33
ExGUtils: A Python Package for Statistical Analysis With the ex-Gaussian Probability Density
Moret‐Tatay, C., Gamermann, D., Navarro‐Pardo, E., & de Córdoba, P. F. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00612 · Cited by 35
“Over the last few decades, much research has been carried out on problems focusing exclusively on success or fail in trials during the performance of a task, emphasizing the importance of RT variables and their relationship to underlying cognitive processes (Sternberg, 1966; Wickelgren, 1977; McVay and Kane, 2012; Rat…”
BackgroundFast and high‐quality decision‐making: The role of behavioral integration
Shepherd, N. G., Mooi, E., Elbanna, S., & Lou, B. (2023) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12573 · Cited by 36
“…to be in tension (Forstmann et al., 2008; Garret, 1922; Hick, 1952; Ollman, 1966; Pachella, 1974; Ratcliff & Rouder, 1998; Schouten & Bekker, 1967; Wickelgren, 1977; Woodworth, 1899), with the general assumption being that slower decisions are more accurate than faster decisions (Donkin et al.,…”
BackgroundMental rotation and fluid intelligence: A brain potential analysis
Varriale, V., van der Molen, M. W., & Pascalis, V. D. (2018) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.05.007 · Cited by 35
Lei, T., Lan, L., & Wang, F. (2023) · Journal of Thermal Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtherbio.2023.103506 · Cited by 35
Evidence for distinct serial processes in animals: The multiplicative-factors method
Roberts, S. (1987) · Animal Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/bf03204959 · Cited by 32
“lever responses 15 Tomie et al., (1973) Pigeons Wavelength Type of training 22 5* 3.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBrief Lags in Interrupted Sequential Performance: Evaluating a Model and Model Evaluation Method
Altmann, E. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.12.007 · Cited by 35
“There is considerable evidence that people can trade speed for accuracy strategically (e.g., Wickelgren, 1977), and there is evidence from interruptions research in particular that linking errors to a high time cost improves accuracy (Brumby et al., 2013).”
BackgroundResponse-selection Conflict Contributes to Inhibition of Return
Prime, D. J., & Jolicœur, P. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21105 · Cited by 32
Replication and extension of the toolbox approach to measuring attention control
Draheim, C., Tsukahara, J. S., & Engle, R. W. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02140-2 · Cited by 37
“Unfortunately, it has often been shown that many cognitive measures are not as process pure as often assumed (see Draheim et al., 2019; Hedge et al., 2018, 2021; Miller & Ulrich, 2013; Wickelgren, 1977).”
BackgroundProcessing covert dependencies: an SAT study on Mandarin wh-in-situ questions
Xiang, M., Dillon, B., WAGERS, M. W., Liu, F., & Guo, T. (2013) · Journal of East Asian Linguistics · doi:10.1007/s10831-013-9115-1 · Cited by 36
“For more in depth discussion, see Wickelgren (1977), Dosher (1979), Meyer et al. (1988), inter alia.”
InfluentialBasner, M., Nasrini, J., Hermosillo, E., McGuire, S., Dinges, D. F., Moore, T. M., Gur, R. C., Rittweger, J., Mulder, E. R., Wittkowski, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00855.2017 · Cited by 29
The mapping between transformed reaction time costs and models of processing in aging and cognition.
Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000298 · Cited by 35
“This has the consequence of making within-subject effects in accuracy difficult to detect, while producing large RT effects, as seen in Scenario C (see also Ratcliff et al., 2000; Wickelgren, 1977).”
BackgroundInfluentialCore body temperature speeds up temporal processing and choice behavior under deadlines
van Maanen, L., van der Mijn, R., van Beurden, M. H. P. H., Roijendijk, L., Kingma, B., Miletić, S., & van Rijn, H. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46073-3 · Cited by 34
On the mechanics of goal striving: Experimental evidence of coasting and shifting.
Thürmer, J. L., Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2019) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000157 · Cited by 31
“Lastly, the goal of responding accurately and correctly are negatively interdependent (speed-accuracy tradeoff; e.g., Wickelgren, 1977), and therefore should make coasting possible and functional.”
BackgroundValue certainty in drift-diffusion models of preferential choice.
Lee, D. G., & Usher, M. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000329 · Cited by 31
“Moreover, this model accounts well for the dependency of the RT distribution on the values (or stimulus strength) of the choice options (Ratcliff & Rouder, 1998; Ratcliff & McKoon, 2008), and for the speed-accuracy tradeoff — the often-observed phenomenon that decision makers are able to improve their choice accuracy…”
MethodMemory updating practice across 100 days in the COGITO study.
Shing, Y. L., Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2011) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0025568 · Cited by 34
Speed-accuracy tradeoff by a control signal with balanced excitation and inhibition
Lo, C., Wang, C.-T., & Wang, X. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00845.2013 · Cited by 39
How honey bees make fast and accurate decisions
MaBouDi, H., Marshall, J. A. R., Dearden, N., & Barron, A. B. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.86176 · Cited by 35
Who's the Best? A Relativistic View of Expertise
Weiss, D. J., & Shanteau, J. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3015 · Cited by 36
Magnetoencephalography decoding reveals structural differences within integrative decision processes
Eldar, E., Bae, G. J., Kurth-Nelson, Z. L., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0423-3 · Cited by 30
Rieger, T., Heilmann, L., & Manzey, D. (2021) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-021-00280-7 · Cited by 30
“Regarding general performance consequences in controlled laboratory experiments, there is usually a speed–accuracy tradeoff in visual search tasks (e.g., Drury 1994; Wickelgren 1977) which has also been shown in a luggage screening task (e.g., McCarley 2009).”
BackgroundSpeed pressure in conflict situations impedes inhibitory action control in Parkinson's disease
van Wouwe, N. C., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Claassen, D. O., Kanoff, K. E., Bashore, T. R., & Wylie, S. A. (2014) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.002 · Cited by 33
“The effects of time pressure on the speed and accuracy of reactions typically follow the aptly named Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff (SAT) function (Wickelgren, 1977): prioritizing the speed of reactions yields faster responses at the cost of making more errors, whereas prioritizing response accuracy…”
BackgroundBalancing and pointing tasks in dyslexic and control adults
Stoodley, C. J., Fawcett, A. J., Nicolson, R. I., & Stein, J. F. (2006) · Dyslexia · doi:10.1002/dys.326 · Cited by 31
“To combine these two scores to account for the speed-accuracy tradeoff (Wickelgren, 1977), the effect sizes of the rate and error scores of the groups were calculated based on the mean and standard deviation of the control group.”
MethodÖztekin, I., & McElree, B. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0018029 · Cited by 28
“…representations can engender differences in response time, even when the underlying speed of information accrual is identical (e.g., Dosher, 1976, 1981; McElree & Dosher, 1989; Murdock, 1971; Ratcliff, 1978; Wickelgren, 1977; Wickelgren et al., 1980; for a review and discussion, see McElree, 2006).”
Hemispheric differences for visual search: Serial vs parallel processing revisited
Polich, J. M. (1982) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(82)90104-x · Cited by 30
From neurophysiology to perception
Warren, R. M. (1979) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00062592 · Cited by 30
Promising High Monetary Rewards for Future Task Performance Increases Intermediate Task Performance
Zedelius, C. M., Veling, H., Bijleveld, E., & Aarts, H. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042547 · Cited by 33
“That is, strategic responding to high rewards should lead to a speed accuracy trade-off–a sacrifice of accuracy for greater speed [41,42].”
BackgroundPerceptual Decision-Making in Children: Age-Related Differences and EEG Correlates
Manning, C., Wagenmakers, E., Norcia, A. M., Scerif, G., & Boehm, U. (2020) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-020-00087-7 · Cited by 30
“This approach fails to make use of all of the available data and means that results could be contaminated by age-related differences in speed-accuracy tradeoffs (Ho et al. 2012; Wickelgren 1977).”
BackgroundDomingue, B. W., Kanopka, K., Stenhaug, B., Sulik, M. J., Beverly, T., Brinkhuis, M. J. S., Circi, R., Faul, J. D., Liao, D., McCandliss, B. D., et al. (2022) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986221099906 · Cited by 32
“The basic notion of the speed–accuracy trade-off (SAT) is an intuitively appealing one: An individual’s slow, deliberative decisions should, all else equal, be more accurate than rushed decisions (Wickelgren, 1977; see also Figure 1).”
BackgroundLiu, Y. (2009) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447310902973182 · Cited by 29
Dambacher, M. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00248 · Cited by 35
“Consequently, independent analyses of response times and accuracy are often difficult to interpret and may even lead to inaccurate conclusions (Wickelgren, 1977).”
BackgroundKelly, S., Bailey, A., & Hirata, Y. (2017) · Collabra: Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.76 · Cited by 34
Strategically managing learning during perceptual decision making
Masis, J. A., Chapman, T., Rhee, J. Y., Cox, D., & Saxe, A. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.64978 · Cited by 42
“…measurement of optimal behavior (i.e. maximization of reward per unit time) (Woodworth, 1899, Henmon, 1911, Garrett, 1922, Pew, 1969, Pachella, 1974, Wickelgren, 1977, Ruthruff, 1996, Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998, Gold and Shadlen, 2002, Bogacz et al., 2006; Bogacz et al., 2010; Heitz and Schall,…”
Evans, W. S., Hula, W. D., Quique, Y. M., & Starns, J. J. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-19-00255 · Cited by 33
“Speed–accuracy tradeoffs describe a well-known phenomenon in which spending more time on a task tends to increase performance accuracy (e.g., Wickelgren, 1977), but often only up to a certain point, after which additional time spent results in diminishing additional gains in accuracy (Evans et al.,…”
BackgroundBlacker, K. J., Pettijohn, K. A., Roush, G., & Biggs, A. T. (2020) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820916975 · Cited by 28
“While decades of research have demonstrated a speed–accuracy tradeoff in decision- making tasks (e.g., Fitts, 1966; Wickelgren, 1977), this is the first demonstration of this finding in the context of lethal force performance to the best of our knowledge.”
BackgroundIntermediate Syntactic Variants in a Dialect-Standard Speech Repertoire and Relative Acceptability
Cornips, L. M. E. A. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0005 · Cited by 27
How strategic is the central bottleneck: Can it be overcome by trying harder?
Ruthruff, E. D., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. W. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0015784 · Cited by 28
Assessing clinical reasoning (ASCLIRE): Instrument development and validation
Kunina‐Habenicht, O., Hautz, W. E., Knigge, M., Spies, C., & Ahlers, O. (2015) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-015-9596-y · Cited by 26
Modeling accuracy as a function of response time with the generalized linear mixed effects model.
Davidson, D., & Martin, A. E. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.016 · Cited by 28
“The notion that people can trade response time for accuracy in any task has been well-documented (Fitts, 1966; Garret, 1922; Hick, 1952; Ollman, 1966; Pachella & Pew, 1968; Pew, 1969; Schouten & Bekker, 1967; Wickelgren, 1977; Woodworth, 1899).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCognitive control in young adults with cannabis use disorder: An event-related brain potential study
Maij, D. L. R., van de Wetering, B. J., & Franken, I. H. A. (2017) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881117719262 · Cited by 33
“In our view, the CUD patients decreased the response speed in order to prevent inhibition errors (i.e. a speed–accuracy tradeoff; Wickelgren, 1977).”
BackgroundStrobel, S. M., Sills, J. M., Tinker, M. T., & Reichmuth, C. J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.181347 · Cited by 29
“Sensory perception is a trade-off between speed and accuracy (see, e.g. Fitts, 1966;Wickelgren, 1977).”
BackgroundEvidence integration and decision confidence are modulated by stimulus consistency
Glickman, M., Moran, R., & Usher, M. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01318-6 · Cited by 36
“, 2006; Brown & Heathcote, 2008; Gold & Shadlen, 2001; Ratcliff & McKoon, 2008; Teodorescu & Usher, 2013; Usher & McClelland, 2001; Vickers, 1970) provide a parsimonious account for the shape of choice-RT distributions of correct and incorrect responses as a function of stimulus difficulty, as well as for the wellknow…”
BackgroundDynamics of Visual Perceptual Decision-Making in Freely Behaving Mice
You, W.-K., & Mysore, S. P. (2022) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0161-21.2022 · Cited by 26
“To quantify these dynamics, we fit the conditional accuracy data with an asymptotic function (Fig. 2A,C, solid curves; Wickelgren, 1977; McElree and Dosher, 1989; Heitz, 2014), and estimated three key metrics, in each Research Article: New Research 8 of 14”
BackgroundMethodNishihara, N., Wargocki, P. L., & Tanabe, S. (2013) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.09.018 · Cited by 27
Comparing time-accuracy curves: Beyond goodness-of-fit measures
Liu, C. C., & Smith, P. L. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.1.190 · Cited by 29
“The response signal paradigm is a popular method for controlling SATs (Dosher, 1979; Reed, 1976; Wickelgren, 1977 ).”
MethodDynamics of individual perceptual decisions
Merfeld, D. M., Clark, T. K., Lu, Y. M., & Karmali, F. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00225.2015 · Cited by 27
Jones, S. A. H., Butler, B. C., Kintzel, F., Johnson, A., Klein, R. M., & Eskes, G. A. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00823 · Cited by 27
“The DalCAB emphasizes reaction time and accuracy measures that have been consistently related to attentional functions and can be sensitively and robustly measured (e.g., Sternberg, 1966; Wicklegren, 1977; see below).”
BackgroundMethodExpertise with unfamiliar objects is flexible to changes in task but not changes in class
Searston, R. A., & Tangen, J. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178403 · Cited by 27
“It is possible that novices were prioritizing speed over accuracy and that slowing them down might dilute the expert accuracy advantage we observed for fingerprints [42].”
BackgroundIs There Evidence for a Mixture of Processes in Speed‐Accuracy Trade‐Off Behavior?
van Maanen, L. (2016) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12182 · Cited by 28
The prerequisites for one-jint motor control theories
Adamovich, S. V., & Feldman, A. G. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0004824x · Cited by 27
Shape, perspective, and what is and is not perceived: Comment on Morales, Bax, and Firestone (2020).
Burge, J., & Burge, T. (2022) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000363 · Cited by 28
“The close relationship between speed and accuracy has been known for decades, and is predicted by the drift-diffusion model, a model commonly used to account for such data (Barack & Gold, 2016; Norman & Wickelgren, 1969; Palmer et al., 2005; Uchida et al., 2006; Watson, 1979; Wickelgren, 1977).”
MethodUrgent Decision Making: Resolving Visuomotor Interactions at High Temporal Resolution
Stanford, T. R., & Salinas, E. (2021) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-103842 · Cited by 31
Chapter 18 Cognitive Processes in Stated Preference Methods
Fischhoff, B. (2005) · Handbook of environmental economics · doi:10.1016/s1574-0099(05)02018-8 · Cited by 28
Wang, C.-T., Lee, C.-T., Wang, X., & Lo, C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062379 · Cited by 23
“speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) is a salient feature of decision making [27–30] and is commonly described as the result of adjusting a decision threshold in a drift diffusion model (DDM)”
BackgroundUsing Decision Models to Enhance Investigations of Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience
White, C. N., Curl, R. A., & Sloane, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00081 · Cited by 26
“There is robust evidence that additional factors like how cautiously a participant responds (i.e., their speed/accuracy settings) affect both RTs and accuracy (e.g., Wickelgren, 1977; Ratcliff et al., 2004).”
BackgroundNeural Mechanisms for Perceptual Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Heekeren, H. R. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-416008-8.00019-x · Cited by 29
Modeling accuracy, response time, and bias in continuous orientation judgments.
Kvam, P. D. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000606 · Cited by 27
Prolonged response time helps eliminate residual errors in visuomotor adaptation
Langsdorf, L., Maresch, J., Hegele, M., McDougle, S. D., & Schween, R. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01865-x · Cited by 27
“…& Alimi, 1997) and perception (Grosjean et al., 2007) to memory (Hacker, 1980) and mental imagery (Cerritelli et al., 2000), as well as across species from insects (e.g., Ings & Chittka, 2008) and rodents (e.g., Rinberg et al., 2006) to monkeys (Heitz & Schall, 2012) and humans (Wickelgren, 1977).”
BackgroundResponse Time versus Accuracy in Human Memory
(1999) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4877.003.0014 · Cited by 26
Confrontation Naming: Computational Model and Disconnection Simulation
Gordon, B. (1982) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-059780-2.50034-6 · Cited by 26
Math Garden: A new educational and scientific instrument
Straatemeier, M. (2014) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 25
Selective cognitive deficits in adult rats after prenatal exposure to inhaled ethanol
Oshiro, W. M., Beasley, T. E., McDaniel, K. L., Taylor, M., Evansky, P., MOSER, V. C., Gilbert, M. E., & Bushnell, P. J. (2014) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2014.07.001 · Cited by 25
A primer on assessing intelligence in laboratory studies
Ackerman, P. L., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2020) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101440 · Cited by 24
“…and 1 Because speed and accuracy are considered to have a non-linear relationship, study participants are often instructed to keep a constant high level of accuracy, and to respond as quickly as possible without sacrificing accuracy, see Wickelgren (1977). classification”; Humphreys, 1962, p. 482).”
BackgroundCheetham, M., & Jäncke, L. (2013) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/4375 · Cited by 25
Auditory Stroop Effects in Children With Hearing Impairment
Jerger, S. W., Stout, G. G., Kent, M., Albritton, E., Loiselle, L. H., Blondeau, R., & Jorgenson, S. (1993) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3605.1083 · Cited by 25
Hargreaves, I. S., & Pexman, P. M. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.001 · Cited by 25
“, allor-none) processes that are differentially distributed across the time course of the decision (Kello, Plaut, & MacWhinney, 2000; Wickelgren, 1977).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEvaluating the two-component inspection model in a simplified luggage search task
Wales, A., Anderson, C., Jones, K., Schwaninger, A., & Horne, J. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.3.937 · Cited by 25
“…a second formula can be used: P(Hit) {1 exp[ (x NSTh)/STh]} * Pdh, (2) where P(Hit) is the y-value that is generated by graphing the function that uses the values of the NSTh, STh, and Pdh (see Figure 1), and this formula is similar to other speed–accuracy curve equations (i.e., Wickelgren, 1977).”
MethodThe Discovery and Interpretation of Evidence Accumulation Stages
van Maanen, L., Portoles, O., & Borst, J. P. (2021) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-021-00105-2 · Cited by 28
“However, a lower threshold also increases the probability that the participant makes errors, resulting in the classical speed-accuracy trade-off (Bogacz et al. 2010; Heitz 2014; Schouten and Bekker 1967; Wickelgren 1977).”
BackgroundA Systematic Investigation of Accuracy and Response Time Based Measures Used to Index ANS Acuity
Dietrich, J. F., Huber, S., Klein, E., Willmes, K., Pixner, S., & Moeller, K. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163076 · Cited by 24
Servant, M., Tillman, G., Schall, J. D., Logan, G. D., & Palmeri, T. J. (2019) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00507.2018 · Cited by 25
“For example, Cassey et al. (2014) analyzed some RT distributions from monkeys Q and S and suggested that the monkeys were timing responses relative to the enforced deadline (Heitz 2014; Wickelgren 1977).”
Yamanaka, S., & Usuba, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3427333 · Cited by 24
“The success rate has been shown to vary nonlinearly depending on whether users try to shorten the operation time or aim carefully [52, 54, 55].”
BackgroundThe Pictorial Fire Stroop: A Measure of Processing Bias for Fire-Related Stimuli
Gallagher-Duffy, J., MacKay, S., Duffy, J., Sullivan-Thomas, M., & Peterson‐Badali, M. (2009) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9339-8 · Cited by 24
“It should be noted that speed and accuracy can be traded one for the other on many cognitive tasks (Salthouse and Hedden 2002; Wickelgren 1977 ), and that simply considering either speed or accuracy by itself does not establish respondents’ sensitivity to the stimuli.”
BackgroundThe effects of task instructions on pro and antisaccade performance
Taylor, A., & Hutton, S. B. (2009) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1750-4 · Cited by 26
“Wickelgren 1977 ). We contrasted pro and antisaccade performance under instructions that emphasised either speed or accuracy in responding, and also adopted a “delay” instruction as used by Mosimann et al. (2004).”
BackgroundEffect of photoarray exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy and processing strategy
Brewer, N., Gordon, M., & Bond, N. W. (2000) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/10683160008410829 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Wickelgren, W. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wickelgren, Wayne A.
- Venue
- Acta Psychologica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-85
- ISSN
- 0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973624057
- Cited by
- 1,304
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 17.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- speed-accuracy trade-off, reaction time, response deadlines, payoffs, perceptual processing, recognition memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review