Cited by 301Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Numerical data on neocortical neurons in adult rat, with special reference to the GABA population

Beaulieu, Clermont·1993·Brain Research

Abstract

The disector method was used to estimate the numerical density of neurons (number per unit volume) and their actual number per column (number under a given area of pial surface), in the occipital (monocular segment of the primary visual area, Oc1M), the parietal (somatosensory barrelfield area, Par1) and the frontal cortex (primary motor area, Fr1) of adult rat. Values were first obtained for all neurons in each layer, and then for GABA neurons as identified with postembedding immunocytochemistry on semithin sections. The numerical density of neurons in the frontal cortex (34,000/mm3) was significantly lower than in the two other neocortical areas (occipital: 52,000; parietal: 48,000/mm3). The GABA population showed a similar difference and consequently represented an equivalent proportion of total (15%) in the three cortical areas. Across layers, there was an alternate distribution of low and high density of neurons from layers II-III to VI in the three cortical areas, with the highest density in layer IV of the two sensory areas. The laminar changes in density of the GABA neurons were not as pronounced as those of the overall population. Consequently, the layers with the highest overall neuronal densities tended to have a lower proportion of GABA neurons and vice versa. There were more neurons under 1 mm2 of surface in the parietal (90,000) than the occipital or the frontal cortex (71,000), which was also true of the GABA neurons. The greater number of neurons per column in the parietal cortex was mostly imputable to layer IV, the main recipient of thalamic axons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90884-p

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beaulieu, C.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Beaulieu, Clermont
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-04
Volume
609
Issue
1-2
Pages
284-292
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995194777
Cited by
301
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
neocortical neurons, GABAergic neurons, neuronal density, cortical layers, primary visual cortex, primary motor cortex, layer 4, rat cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Motor Cortex, Neurons, Somatosensory Cortex, Visual Cortex, Tissue Embedding, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review