Cited by 231Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

Quantitative Analysis of the Expression of Dopamine D1 and D2 Receptors in Pyramidal and GABAergic Neurons of the Rat Prefrontal Cortex

Santana, N., Mengod, G., Artigas, F.·2009·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Mesocortical dopamine (DA) is a key neurotransmitter in cognitive processes and is involved in schizophrenia and antipsychotic drug action. DA exerts a highly complex modulation of network activity in prefrontal cortex (PFC), possibly due to the recruitment of multiple signaling pathways and to specialized cellular localizations of DA receptors in cortical microcircuits. Using double in situ hybridization, we quantitatively assessed the expression of D(1) and D(2) receptor messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in pyramidal and gamma-aminobutyric acidergic (GABAergic) neurons of rat PFC. The proportion of pyramidal and GABA cells expressing these transcripts shows great regional variability in PFC, with little overlap (layer V). More pyramidal and GABA cells express D(1) than D(2) receptors. D(1) receptors are expressed by a greater proportion of GABA than pyramidal neurons, yet the number of D(1)-positive pyramidal cells outnumbers D(1)-positive interneurons due to the greater abundance of pyramidal neurons. Occasional PFC cells show high levels of mRNA, similar to those in striatal neurons. Finally, pyramidal and GABAergic cells expressing the same transcript were almost never found in close apposition, yet D(2)-containing pyramidal neurons were often found close to non-D(2) GABA neurons. Thus, cellular and network DA actions in PFC are region and layer specific and may depend on precise cellular interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhn134

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The D2 receptor is expressed by at least a subset of hiPS cell-derived cortical neurons, similar to what has been reported in vivo.

    “We found that the D2 receptor is expressed by at least a subset of hiPS cell–derived cortical neurons, similar to what has been reported in vivo49,50”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santana, N., Mengod, G., & Artigas, F.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2008-08-09
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
849-860
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2102001229
Cited by
231
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, prefrontal cortex, pyramidal neurons, GABAergic interneurons, mesocortical dopamine, receptor mRNA expression, schizophrenia, cortical microcircuits
MeSH terms
Animals, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Gene Expression Regulation, Male, Neurons, Rats, Wistar, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Pyramidal Cells, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review