Cited by 74Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Inhibition of vasopressin-stimulated flank marking behavior by V1-receptor antagonists

Ferris, Craig F., Singer, Ernst A., Meenan, David M., Elliott Albers, H.·1988·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Flank marking, a form of olfactory communication displayed by hamsters, is dependent upon vasopressin-sensitive neurons in the anterior hypothalamus. In the present study two vasopressin type-1 (V1) receptor antagonists, d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP and dPTyr(Me)AVP were tested for their ability to block flank marking stimulated by the microinjection of arginine vasopressin (AVP) into the anterior hypothalamus. Dose-response curves were established for AVP and flank marking in the presence or absence of different concentrations of each antagonist. DPTyr(Me)AVP was microinjected into the anterior hypothalamus 1 h before the microinjection of AVP while d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP and AVP were prepared together and delivered as a single microinjection. This procedure was necessary because dPTyr(Me)AVP, but not d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP, had agonist activity when initially injected into the anterior hypothalamus in concentrations ranging from 0.90-900 microM. The ED50 values (microM) for dPTyr(Me)AVP and AVP were 17.9 and 0.90, respectively. The initial agonist activity of dPTyr(Me)AVP was always followed by blocker activity. Both V1-receptor antagonists caused a dose-dependent decrease in AVP-stimulated flank marking. Maximal inhibition of AVP-stimulated flank marking was produced with approximately 1.0 mM of either antagonist. Both antagonists blocked AVP-stimulated flank marking behavior for over 12 h following their microinjection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90092-1

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferris, C. F., Singer, E. A., Meenan, D. M., & Elliott Albers, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Ferris, Craig F.
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-09
Volume
154
Issue
2
Pages
153-159
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046364593
Cited by
74
References
21
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-23557)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
flank marking, vasopressin, V1 receptor antagonist, anterior hypothalamus, olfactory communication, hamster, d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP, behavioral inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Communication, Arginine Vasopressin, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Cricetinae, Male, Mesocricetus, Receptors, Angiotensin, Scent Glands, Vasopressins, Receptors, Vasopressin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review