Cited by 85Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Vasopressin in the brain of the golden hamster: The distribution of vasopressin binding sites and of immunoreactivity to the vasopressin‐related glycopeptide

Dubois‐Dauphin, M., Pevet, P., Triboilet, E., Dreif'Uss, J. J.·1990·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Using in vitro light microscopic autoradiography and immunocytochemistry, the distribu‐ tion of vasopressin binding sites and that of the vasopressin‐related glycopeptide are described in the brain of golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Vasopressin binding sites and immunoreactive axones were observed in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, in the anterior hypothalamus/median preoptic area, in the medial preoptic nucleus, in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, in the habenular complex, in the thalamic paraventricular nucleus, and in the nucleus of the solitary tract. In addition we observed binding sites in regions where no immunoreactivity could be evidenced: the lateral septa1 nucleus, the central amygdaloid nucleus, the subiculum, the dentate gyrus, the anterodorsal and anteroventral thalamic nuclei, the superior colliculus, the vestibular nuclei, and in the prepositus hypoglossal nucleus. In the golden hamster, exogenous vasopressin excites single neurones located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and induces flank‐marking behavior when microinjected into the preoptic area. Our results provide a morphological basis for similar effects exerted by endogenous vasopressin. A comparison of the present data with those previously described in the rat reveals marked species differences in the brain distribution of vasopressin and of its binding sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903000408

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dubois‐Dauphin, M., Pevet, P., Triboilet, E., & Dreif'Uss, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-10-22
Volume
300
Issue
4
Pages
535-548
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2034348890
Cited by
85
References
49
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
vasopressin, golden hamster, suprachiasmatic nucleus, preoptic area, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, habenula, paraventricular nucleus, solitary tract nucleus, hypothalamus
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Behavior, Animal, Brain Chemistry, Female, Glycopeptides, Cricetinae, Male, Mesocricetus, Receptors, Angiotensin, Species Specificity, Vasopressins, Receptors, Vasopressin, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review