Cited by 208Personality Traits and PsychologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Relating self-discrepancy to self-esteem: The contribution of discrepancy beyond actual-self ratings

Moretti, Marlene M, Tory Higgins, E·1990·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(90)90071-s

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moretti, M. M., & Tory Higgins, E.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Moretti, Marlene M
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-03
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
108-123
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048027433
Cited by
208
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-discrepancy theory, self-esteem, actual self, ideal self, self-concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review