Cited by 170Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Paradoxical” effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs in hyperactive children from the standpoint of behavioural pharmacology

Robbins, T.W., Sahakian, B.J.·1979·Neuropharmacology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0028-3908(79)90157-6

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings can be interpreted in the light of a hypothesized inverted U-shaped function relating dopamine and noradrenaline activity to performance.

    “These findings can be interpreted in the light of a hypothesized inverted U-shaped function relating dopamine and noradrenaline activity to performance (Robbins and Sahakian, 1979).”
  • It is consistent with a growing literature documenting baseline performance-dependent effects of stimulants and related drugs, which have been explained by a hypothesized inverted U-shaped function, whereby optimal catecholamine levels determine optimal performance, and levels along the curve at either side of the optimum are associated with impaired performance.

    “It is also consistent with a growing literature documenting baseline performance-dependent effects of stimulants and related drugs, which have been explained by a hypothesized inverted U-shaped function, whereby optimal catecholamine levels determine optimal performance, and levels along the curve at either side of the optimum are associated with impaired performance (Robbins and Sahakian, 1979; N”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lyon, 1975, The action of central nervous system stimulant drugs: a general theory concerning amphetamine effects, Vol. 2, 79
  2. Rapoport, 1979, Dextro-amphetamine: cognitive and behavioral effects on normal and hyperactive children and normal adults, Archs gen. Psychiat.
  3. Sahakian, 1978, Hyperactive children and the drug paradox, New Scient., 80, 350

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Robbins, T.W.
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-12
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
931-950
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007634374
Cited by
170
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
hyperactivity, hyperkinetic disorder, psychostimulants, methylphenidate, amphetamine, rate dependence, attention, cognitive flexibility, stereotypy
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention, Behavior, Child, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Social Behavior, Stereotyped Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review