Cited by 52Regulation of Appetite and ObesityAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Influence of dietary protein level on protein self-selection and plasma and brain amino acid concentrations

PETERS, J, HARPER, A·1984·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Control of protein intake was studied in young rats that were allowed to choose between either protein-free and 55% casein diets or 15% and 55% casein diets. Animals on the protein-free vs. 55% casein regimen exhibited a lower weight gain, a lower cumulative energy intake and a greater cumulative total protein intake during the 13-day study compared to rats selecting between 15% and 55% casein. The daily average proportion of total food selected as casein by animals choosing between protein-free and 55% casein diets increased from 15% to 38% during the course of the study. In contrast, rats choosing between 15% and 55% casein chose 18-22% of total food as protein throughout the entire study. Long-term protein intake or protein selection did not correlate significantly with whole-brain contents of 5-HT or 5-HIAA. Our results suggest that protein intake is not regulated at a constant proportion of total calories, but is controlled between a minimum level that will support rapid growth and a maximum that, if exceeded, would require the animal to undergo substantial metabolic adaptation. The mechanism controlling protein selection may involve diet-induced changes in the brain content of total free indispensable amino acids.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90048-9

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When given a choice, a wide range of species will self-select between diets that are high and low in protein in order to maintain protein intake.

    “When given a choice, a wide range of species will self-select between diets that are high and low in protein in order to maintain protein intake”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PETERS, J., & HARPER, A.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
HARPER, A
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-11
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
783-790
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969892303
Cited by
52
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
protein intake, casein, protein-free diet, amino acid metabolism, brain amino acids, serotonin, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, energy intake, weight gain, metabolic adaptation, rats
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Brain Chemistry, Caseins, Dietary Proteins, Food Preferences, Growth, Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid, Male, Serotonin, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review