Cited by 103Regulation of Appetite and ObesityAmino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Protein intake, brain amino acid and serotonin concentrations and protein self-selection

Harper, Alfred E., Peters, John C.·1989·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Analysis of evidence of associations among dietary protein content, brain amino acid and serotonin concentrations, and protein self-selection by rats suggests that 1) protein intake is not regulated precisely, although rats will select between low and high protein diets to obtain an adequate, but not excessive, amount of protein; 2) associations between brain serotonin concentration and protein intake are weak, although consumption of single meals of protein-deficient diets will elevate brain serotonin concentration; 3) the nature of signals that drive rats to avoid diets containing inadequate or excessive amounts of protein remains obscure; (4) whole brain amino acid and serotonin concentrations are quite stable over the usual range of protein intakes, owing to competition among amino acids for uptake across the blood-brain barrier and effective metabolic regulation of blood amino acid concentrations; 5) protein intake and preference are not in themselves regulated, but what appears to be regulation of intake and preference is a reflection of the responses of systems for control of plasma amino acid concentrations; and (6) the relative stability of the average protein intake of groups of self-selecting rats (which gives the appearance of regulation) results from averaging the variable behavioral responses--learned aversions and preferences--of rats to the variety of sensory cues arising from diets that differ in protein content.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/119.5.677

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harper, A. E., & Peters, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-05
Volume
119
Issue
5
Pages
677-689
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130370422
Cited by
103
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK10747)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
protein intake, brain serotonin, brain amino acids, protein-deficient diet, learned aversion, learned preferences, rats, food intake regulation
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Brain, Dietary Proteins, Food Preferences, Humans, Osmolar Concentration, Serotonin, Tryptophan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review