Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 930

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization

Leonard-Barton, Dorothy·1988·Research Policy
DOI 10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Bazerman, 1985, Integrative Bargaining in a Competitive Market, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 294, 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90026-3 · DOI
  2. Boston University School of Management, 1986, The Stendhai Mill Control: Technology Transfer at Superior Steel
  3. Chakrabarti, 1973, Some Concepts of Technology Transfer: Adoption of Innovations in Organizational Context, R&D Management, 3, 111, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1973.tb01014.x · DOI
  4. Clark, 1985, The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and Market Concepts in Technological Evolution, Research Policy, 14, 235, 10.1016/0048-7333(85)90007-1 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cohen, 1979, The Transfer of Technology from Research to Development, Research Management, 11, 10.1080/00345334.1979.11756535 · DOI
  6. Damanpour, 1984, Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of 'Organizational Lag', Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 392, 10.2307/2393031 · DOI
  7. DeLacey, 1986, Solagen: Process Improvement in the Manufacture of Gelatin, Harvard Business School Case Services #9-687-020
  8. Drazin, 1988, Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 514, 10.2307/2392695 · DOI
  9. Ettlie, 1984, Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation, Management Science, 30, 682, 10.1287/mnsc.30.6.682 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Foster, 1982, A Call for Vision in Managing Technology, Business Week, 24
  11. Fry, 1987, Congruence, Contingency, and Theory Building, Academy of Management Review, 12, 117, 10.5465/amr.1987.4306496 · DOI
  12. Gerwin, 1981, Relationships Between Structure and Technology, Vol. 2
  13. Jaikumar, 1986, The Development of Intelligent Systems for Industrial Use: A Conceptual Framework, Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, 3, 169
  14. Kaplan, 1986, Must CIM be Justified by Faith Alone?, Harvard Business Review, 87
  15. Katz, 1982, The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 81, 10.2307/2392547 · DOI
  16. Kerr, 1975, On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B, The Academy of Management Journal, 769, 10.2307/255378 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Leonard-Barton, 1987, New Technology at World Aluminum Corporation: The Jumping Ring Circulator, Harvard Business School Case Services, #0-687-050
  18. Leonard-Barton, 1987, The Case for Integrative Innovation: An Expert System at Digital, Sloan Management Review, 29, 7
  19. Leonard-Barton, 1987, A New CAE System for Shield Electronics Engineers, Harvard Business School Case Services #9-687-081
  20. Leonard-Barton, 1987, Skunkworks at Digital Equipment Corporation: The Tale of XCON, Harvard Business School Case Services #9-687-051
  21. Leonard-Barton, 1988, Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovation: Limits and Opportunities for Managerial Strategies, Journal of Communication Research, 15
  22. Nag, 1986, Auto Makers Discover ‘Factory of the Future’ is Headache Just Now, Wall Street Journal, 207, 1
  23. Nisbett, 1977, The Halo Effect: Evidence for Unconscious Alteration of Judgements, Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 35, 250, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pelz, 1982, Originality Level and the Innovating Process in Organizations, Human Systems Management, 3, 173, 10.3233/HSM-1982-3304 · DOI
  25. Rice, 1980, Reinvention in the Innovation Process, Knowledge, 1, 499, 10.1177/107554708000100402 · DOI
  26. Roberts, 1968, A Basic Study of Innovators: How to Keep and Capitalize on Their Talents, Research Management, 11, 249, 10.1080/00345334.1968.11755911 · DOI
  27. Rockart, 1979, Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs, Harvard Business Review, 57, 81
  28. Rothwell, 1977, Some Problems of Technology Transfer into Industry: Examples from the Textile Machinery Sector, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-25, 15, 10.1109/TEM.1978.6447270 · DOI
  29. Rousseau, 1984, Technology and Structure, The Concrete, Abstract, and Activity Systems of Organizations, Journal of Management, 10, 345, 10.1177/014920638401000308 · DOI
  30. Rubenstein, 1985, Effectiveness of the Interface Between R&D and Production, Final Report to Productivity Research Program, Engineering Division, of the National Science Foundation
  31. Saren, 1984, A Classification and Review of Models of the Intra-firm Innovation Process, R&D Management, 14, 11, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1984.tb00504.x · DOI
  32. Skinner, 1986, The Productivity Paradox, Harvard Business Review, 86, 55
  33. Sviokla, 1986, Smartwave B: Implementing An Expert System at Digital Equipment Corporation, Harvard Business School Case #9-187-063
  34. Andrew Van de Ven, Central Problems in the Management of Innovation, Management Science 32 (5) 590–607. · DOI
  35. Von Hippel, 1976, The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process, Research Policy, 5, 212, 10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028-7 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Yin, 1984, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Vol. 5
  37. Zuboff, 1982, New Worlds of Computer-mediated Work, Harvard Business Review, 142

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Leonard-Barton, D.
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-10
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
251-267
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6
OpenAlex
W2002644915
Cited by
930
References
3
FWCI
15.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.