Cited by 125Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Optimizing exposure therapy for anxiety disorders: an inhibitory learning and inhibitory regulation approach

Open access
Craske, Michelle·2015·Verhaltenstherapie

Abstract

Exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapy is the treatment of choice for anxiety disorders. Unfortunately, many individuals fail to benefit from treatment or demonstrate a return of fear. Inhibitory learning and inhibitory regulation models provide a parsimonious and unifying framework from which to situate exposure therapy and provide useful strategies to augment exposure therapy, especially as individuals with anxiety disorders show inhibitory deficits. This paper provides an overview of our application of inhibitory learning from the science of extinction, and inhibitory regulation from the neuroscience of emotion regulation, to exposure therapy for anxiety disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000381574

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure therapy is based on the assumption that phobic anxiety and fear are reduced by repeated exposure to feared or avoided stimuli, resulting in habituation and fear extinction by repeated violation of threat expectancy.

    “In general, exposure therapy is based on the assumption that phobic anxiety and fear are reduced by repeated exposure to feared or avoided stimuli, resulting in habituation and fear extinction by repeated violation of threat expectancy (62, 63).”

    From Combined Fainting and Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures as Significant Therapy Hurdles in Blood-Injury-Injection Phobia: A Mini-Review and Case Report (2022) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Introduction (page not provided) defines exposure therapy as repeated exposure to feared or avoided cues, and the Violation of Expectancies section links extinction learning to violated threat expectancies. But the Mechanisms section treats habituation as a descriptive pattern, not an established mechanism of lasting improvement; the paper also says fear reduction is not the goal of its expectancy-violation approach. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inhibitory learning is currently deemed the more suitable explanation model for anxiety disorders, especially since these patients display impaired inhibitory regulation and learning and thus extinction.

    “Inhibitory learning is currently deemed the more suitable explanation model for anxiety disorders, especially since these patients display impaired inhibitory regulation and learning and thus extinction (63).”

    From Combined Fainting and Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures as Significant Therapy Hurdles in Blood-Injury-Injection Phobia: A Mini-Review and Case Report (2022) · cites this paper as [63]

    The ‘Deficits in Inhibition in Anxiety Disorders’ section says that people with anxiety disorders show deficits in extinction learning and that inhibitory-learning deficits may help explain persistent fear. The paper also describes inhibitory learning as central to extinction, but it does not clearly rank it as the more suitable explanation model for anxiety disorders as a whole. Our copy provides no page number for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exposure therapy reduces anxiety by weakening learned associations between feared stimuli and negative outcomes, and strengthening inhibitory learning.

    “Exposure therapy, a potent behavioral treatment approach used in CBT, reduces anxiety by weakening learned associations between feared stimuli and negative outcomes, and strengthening inhibitory learning (i.e., a feared stimulus does not signal threat) (Craske, 2015).”

    From Exposure Therapy Acceptability Among Pregnant Latinas With Anxiety: A Qualitative Content Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Craske, 2015

    The Introduction describes exposure therapy as effective, and the ‘Mechanisms of Exposure Therapy: Inhibitory Model of Extinction’ section supports the development of a competing, non-threat association that can lessen fear. But that section says the original feared-stimulus–outcome association is left intact, rather than weakened, so the proposed mechanism is only partly supported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bjork RA, Bjork EL: A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation; in Healy A, Kosslyn S, Shiffrin R (eds): From Learning Processes to Cognitive Processes: Essays in Honor of William K. Estes, vol 2. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum, 1992, pp 35-67.
  2. Bjork RA, Bjork EL: Optimizing treatment and instruction: implications of a new theory of disuse; in Nilsson LG, Ohta N (eds): Memory and Society: Psychological Per- spectives. New York, Psychology Press, 2006.
  3. Foa EB, McNally RJ: Mechanisms of change in exposure therapy; in Rapee RM (ed): Current Controversies in the Anxiety Disorders. New York, Guilford Press, 1996, pp 214-227.
  4. Lieberman MD, Eisenberger NI, Crockett MJ, et al.: Put- ting feelings into words. Psychol Sci 2007; 18: 421-428.
  5. Lovibond PF: Cognitive processes in extinction. Learn Mem 2004; 11: 495-500.
  6. Miller RR, Matzel LD: Contingency and relative associative strength; in Klein SB, Mowrer RR (eds): Contemporary Learning Theories: Pavlovian Conditioning and the Status of Traditional Learning Theory. Hillsdale, Law- rence Erlbaum Associates, 1988 pp. 61-84
  7. Niles AN, Craske MG, Lieberman MD, Hur C: Affect labe- ling enhances exposure effectiveness for public speak- ing anxiety. Behav Res Ther 2015; 68: 27-36.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craske, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Craske, Michelle
Venue
Verhaltenstherapie
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2015
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
134-143
ISSN
  • 1016-6262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0402
OpenAlex
W4294949187
Cited by
124
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Verhaltenstherapie (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
exposure therapy, anxiety disorders, inhibitory learning, extinction, emotion regulation, cognitive behavioral therapy, augmentation therapy, inhibitory deficits, return of fear

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review