Cited by 52Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Cognitive mechanisms underlying virtual reality exposure

Côté, Sophie, Bouchard, Stéphane·2009·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

Many studies have assessed virtual reality exposures efficacy, but very few examined its treatment processes. The addition of objective measures of arousal and information processing mechanisms would be a valuable contribution in order to provide a more complete and detailed picture. The goal of this study was to better document the cognitive mechanisms associated with therapeutic change after an in virtuo exposure treatment. Twenty-eight adults suffering from arachnophobia were assessed and received an exposure-based treatment using virtual reality. General outcome and specific processes measures included a battery of standardized questionnaires, a pictorial emotional Stroop task, a Behavioral Avoidance Test, and a measure of participants' cardiac response while they looked at a live tarantula. The analyses showed that changes in perceived self-efficacy and dysfunctional beliefs were the best predictors of change in general outcome and cardiac response; change in dysfunctional beliefs were the best predictor of change in behavioral avoidance. These innovative results provide a very detailed and organized picture of the complex cognitive mechanisms involved in therapeutic change following in virtuo exposure for arachnophobia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cpb.2008.0008

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Côté, S., & Bouchard, S.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2009-04
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
121-129
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W2095158042
Cited by
52
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, spider phobia, cognitive mechanisms, therapeutic change, self-efficacy, dysfunctional attitudes, cardiac response, behavioral avoidance, emotional Stroop task, treatment process
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Animals, Arousal, Cognition, Culture, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Phobic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spiders, User-Computer Interface, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review