Cited by 175Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNeural dynamics and brain function

Spectral characteristics of resting state networks

Niazy, Rami K., Xie, Jingyi, Miller, Karla, Beckmann, Christian F., Smith, Stephen M.·2011·Progress in brain research

Abstract

Resting state networks (RSNs), as imaged by functional MRI, are distributed maps of areas believed to be involved in the function of the "resting" brain, which appear in both resting and task data. The current dominant view is that such networks are associated with slow (∼0.015Hz), spontaneous fluctuations in the BOLD signal. To date, limited work has investigated the frequency characteristics of RSNs; here we investigate a range of issues relating to their spectral and phase characteristics. Our results indicate that RSNs, although dominated by low frequencies in the raw BOLD signal, are in fact broadband processes that show temporal coherences across a wide frequency spectrum. In addition, we show that RSNs exhibit different levels of phase synchrony at different frequencies. These findings challenge the notion that FMRI resting signals are simple "low frequency" spontaneous signal fluctuations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-53839-0.00017-x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is increasing evidence that there is useful signal at relatively high frequencies in resting-state data.

    “there is increasing evidence that there is useful signal at relatively high frequencies [47].”

    From Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI (2013) · cites this paper as [47]

  • Recent evidence indicates that resting-state network signals occur up to at least 0.2Hz in good quality data.

    “Recent evidence [47] indicates that resting-state network signals occur up to at least 0.2Hz in good quality data;”

    From Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI (2013) · cites this paper as [47]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niazy, R. K., Xie, J., Miller, K., Beckmann, C. F., & Smith, S. M.
Affiliations
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Stephen M.
Venue
Progress in brain research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2011
Volume
193
Pages
259-276
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W152769478
Cited by
175
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 6
FWCI
40.45
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
resting-state networks, functional MRI, BOLD signal, spectral properties, phase synchronization, temporal coherence, spontaneous fluctuations, broadband oscillation, frequency spectrum
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review