Cited by 103Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Robust genetic nurture effects on education: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 38,654 families across 8 cohorts

Open access
Wang, Biyao, Baldwin, Jessie R., Schoeler, Tabea, Cheesman, Rosa, Barkhuizen, Wikus, Dudbridge, Frank, Bann, David, Morris, Tim T. +1 more·2021·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Similarities between parents and offspring arise from nature and nurture. Beyond this simple dichotomy, recent genomic studies have uncovered "genetic nurture" effects, whereby parental genotypes influence offspring outcomes via environmental pathways rather than genetic transmission. Such genetic nurture effects also need to be accounted for to accurately estimate "direct" genetic effects (i.e., genetic effects on a trait originating in the offspring). Empirical studies have indicated that genetic nurture effects are particularly relevant to the intergenerational transmission of risk for child educational outcomes, which are, in turn, associated with major psychological and health milestones throughout the life course. These findings have yet to be systematically appraised across contexts. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify genetic nurture effects on educational outcomes. A total of 12 studies comprising 38,654 distinct parent(s)-offspring pairs or trios from 8 cohorts reported 22 estimates of genetic nurture effects. Genetic nurture effects on offspring's educational outcomes (β genetic nurture = 0.08, 95% CI [0.07, 0.09]) were smaller than direct genetic effects (β direct genetic = 0.17, 95% CI [0.13, 0.20]). Findings were largely consistent across studies. Genetic nurture effects originating from mothers and fathers were of similar magnitude, highlighting the need for a greater inclusion of fathers in educational research. Genetic nurture effects were largely explained by observed parental education and socioeconomic status, pointing to their role in environmental pathways shaping child educational outcomes. Findings provide consistent evidence that environmentally mediated parental genetic influences contribute to the intergenerational transmission of educational outcomes, in addition to effects due to genetic transmission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.07.010

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, B., Baldwin, J. R., Schoeler, T., Cheesman, R., Barkhuizen, W., Dudbridge, F., Bann, D., Morris, T. T., & Pingault, J.-B.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Pingault, Jean-Baptiste
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
108
Issue
9
Pages
1780-1791
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3194256647
Cited by
103
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (215917/Z/19/Z, 218641/Z/19/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/V002147/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M001660/1)
  • Nuffield Foundation (EDO/43939)
  • University College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
educational attainment, intergenerational transmission, parental genotypes, direct genetic effects, parent-offspring trios, parental education, socioeconomic status, environmental mediation, nature versus nurture, child educational outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Educational Status, Family, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Parents, Phenotype, Social Class, Cohort Studies, Inheritance Patterns, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review