PreprintCited by 32Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Estimation of indirect genetic effects and heritability under assortative mating

Open access
Young, Alexander Strudwick·2023·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Both direct genetic effects (effects of alleles in an individual on that individual) and indirect genetic effects — effects of alleles in an individual (e.g. parents) on another individual (e.g. offspring) — can contribute to phenotypic variation and genotype-phenotype associations. Here, we consider a phenotype affected by direct and parental indirect genetic effects under assortative mating at equilibrium. We generalize classical theory to derive a decomposition of the equilibrium phenotypic variance in terms of direct and indirect genetic effect components. We extend this theory to show that popular methods for estimating indirect genetic effects or ‘genetic nurture’ through analysis of parental and offspring polygenic predictors (called polygenic indices or scores — PGIs or PGSs) are substantially biased by assortative mating. We propose an improved method for estimating indirect genetic effects while accounting for assortative mating that can also correct heritability estimates for bias due to assortative mating. We validate our method in simulations and apply it to PGIs for height and educational attainment (EA), estimating that the equilibrium heritability of height is 0.699 (S.E. = 0.075) and finding no evidence for indirect genetic effects on height. We estimate a very high correlation between parents’ underlying genetic components for EA, 0.755 (S.E. = 0.035), which is inconsistent with twin based estimates of the heritability of EA, possibly due to confounding in the EA PGI and/or in twin studies. We implement our method in the software package snipar , enabling researchers to apply the method to data including observed and/or imputed parental genotypes. We provide a theoretical framework for understanding the results of PGI analyses and a practical methodology for estimating heritability and indirect genetic effects while accounting for assortative mating.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.07.10.548458

Cites

53 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DGE-based SNP heritability estimates do not account for the increase in genetic variance due to AM-induced correlations between causal alleles, leading to a downward bias similar to other family-based heritability estimates.

    “However, DGE-based SNP heritability estimates do not account for the increase in genetic variance due to AM-induced correlations between causal alleles, leading to a downward bias similar to other family-based heritability estimates such as classical twin designs and relatedness disequilibrium regression23,36.”
  • Even direct genetic effect PGIs may be correlated with genetic factors not directly captured by the PGI or environmental factors, leading to confounding in standard PGI analysis.

    “Even DGE PGIs may be correlated with genetic factors not directly captured by the PGI or environmental factors, leading to confounding in standard PGI analysis23.”
  • Polygenic indices based on direct genetic effects from FGWAS have favorable properties due to the removal of confounding from PGI weights, making them suited to applications that are sensitive to confounding.

    “Polygenic predictors (called polygenic indices, PGIs, or polygenic scores) based on DGE estimates from FGWAS – hereafter, DGE PGIs – have favorable properties due to the removal of confounding from PGI weights, making them suited to applications that are sensitive to confounding4,5,9,13,23.”
  • Such confounding is expected under assortative mating and thus likely affects height and education-related direct genetic effect PGIs when analyzing relevant outcomes.

    “although such confounding is expected under AM and thus likely affects height and education-related DGE PGIs (when analyzing relevant outcomes)16,23.”
  • These factors include environmental factors and direct genetic effects of other variants with which the PGI is correlated due to non-random mating.

    “These include environmental factors and DGEs of other variants with which the PGI is correlated due to non-random mating15,23.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Crow J. F. & Kimura M. An introduction to population genetics theory. The Blackburn Press (New York, Evanston and London: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1970).
  2. [54]Young A. Relatedness disequilibrium regression estimates heritability without environmental bias Origins of heritability estimation. (2018). PMC6130754 30104764

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, A. S.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-07-11
OpenAlex
W4384038447
Cited by
32
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Open Philanthropy Project (010623-00001 and 2019-198171, 010623-00001)
  • National Institutes of Health (00001)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • National Institute on Aging (R24AG065184, R01AG042568)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
indirect genetic effects, assortative mating, heritability estimation, polygenic risk score, genetic nurture, educational attainment, height, bias correction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review