Cited by 62Sleep and related disordersImpact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital Technology

Media multitasking and sleep problems: A longitudinal study among adolescents

Open access
van der Schuur, Winneke A., Baumgartner, Susanne E., Sumter, Sindy R., Valkenburg, Patti M.·2018·Computers in Human Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.024

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The limited existing research in this area has reported few associations between device use before bed and subsequent sleep, although screen use was measured objectively in just 1 study (smartphones only).

    “The limited existing research in this area has reported few associations between device use before bed and subsequent sleep,19,20,21 although screen use was measured objectively in just 1 study (smartphones only).19”

    From Screen Use at Bedtime and Sleep Duration and Quality Among Youths (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results (§3.2, page unavailable) found no significant association between media multitasking and subsequent sleep problems across the study waves, lending limited support to the statement about few subsequent associations. But this study did not specifically measure device use before bed, and Shortcomings and future research (§4.1, page unavailable) explicitly says it used only subjective self-reports—not objective smartphone tracking. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Muth en, L. K., & Muth en, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muth en & Muth en.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Schuur, W. A., Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., & Valkenburg, P. M.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
81
Pages
316-324
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2776297030
Cited by
62
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
media multitasking, sleep disorders, adolescents, sleep quality, causal direction, longitudinal associations, gender differences, age differences, junior high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review