Cited by 349Cardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Meta-Analysis of Perceived Stress and Its Association With Incident Coronary Heart Disease

Open access
Richardson, Safiya, Shaffer, Jonathan A., Falzon, Louise, Krupka, David, Davidson, Karina W., Edmondson, Donald·2012·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Most studies examining potential associations between psychological factors and cardiovascular outcomes have focused on either depression or anxiety. The effect of perceived stress on incident coronary heart disease (CHD) has yet to be reviewed systematically. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between perceived stress and incident CHD. Ovid MEDLINE and PsycINFO were searched as data sources. Prospective observational cohort studies were selected that measured self-reported perceived stress and assessed incident CHD at minimum of 6 months later. We extracted study characteristics and estimates of the risk of incident CHD associated with high perceived stress vs. low perceived stress. We identified 23 potentially relevant articles, of which 6 met our criteria (N = 118,696). Included studies measured perceived stress with both validated measures and non-validated simple self-report surveys. Incident CHD was defined as new diagnosis of, hospitalization for, or mortality secondary to CHD. Meta-analysis yielded an aggregate risk ratio of 1.27 (95% confidence interval 1.12 – 1.45) for the magnitude of the relation between high perceived stress and incident CHD. In conclusion this meta-analysis suggests that high perceived stress is associated with a moderately increased risk of incident CHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.004

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, S., Shaffer, J. A., Falzon, L., Krupka, D., Davidson, K. W., & Edmondson, D.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Edmondson, Donald
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
110
Issue
12
Pages
1711-1716
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125315255
Cited by
349
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (UL1RR024156)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
perceived stress, coronary artery disease, incident coronary heart disease, psychological stress, cardiovascular risk, self-reported stress, relative risk
MeSH terms
Coronary Disease, Humans, Perception, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review