Cited by 123Gut microbiota and healthBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesOral microbiology and periodontitis research

High-intensity sweetener consumption and gut microbiome content and predicted gene function in a cross-sectional study of adults in the United States

Frankenfeld, Cara L., Sikaroodi, Masoumeh, Lamb, Evan, Shoemaker, Sarah, Gillevet, Patrick M.·2015·Annals of Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate gut microbiome in relation to recent high-intensity sweetener consumption in healthy adults.Methods Thirty-one adults completed a four-day food record and provided a fecal sample on the fifth day. Bacterial community in the samples was analyzed using multitag pyrosequencing. Across consumers and nonconsumers of aspartame and acesulfame-K, bacterial abundance was compared using nonparametric statistics, and bacterial diversity was compared using UniFrac analysis. Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) was used to predict mean relative abundance of gene function.Results There were seven aspartame consumers and seven acesulfame-K consumers. Three individuals overlapped groups, consuming both sweeteners. There were no differences in median bacterial abundance (class or order) across consumers and nonconsumers of either sweetener. Overall bacterial diversity was different across nonconsumers and consumers of aspartame (P < .01) and acesulfame-K (P = .03). Mean predicted gene abundance did not differ across consumers and nonconsumers of aspartame or acesulfame-K.Conclusions Bacterial abundance profiles and predicted gene function were not associated with recent dietary high-intensity sweetener consumption. However, bacterial diversity differed across consumers and nonconsumers. Given the increasing consumption of sweeteners and the role that the microbiome may have in chronic disease outcomes, work in further studies is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.06.083

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nonnutritive sweeteners have been linked to detrimental effects on microbial diversity and composition and decreased butyrate concentration, but evidence is inconsistent, with some reports concluding no clear effects or that only some sweeteners impact the microbial profile.

    “Although earlier human studies indicated detrimental effects on microbial diversity and composition (99, 100) and a more recent study linked consumption of nonnutritive sweeteners to a “dysbiosis” [an increasingly redundant term in microbiome research (171)] and a decrease in butyrate concentration (172), some reports have concluded that no clear effects of sweeteners on the microbiota can be”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frankenfeld, C. L., Sikaroodi, M., Lamb, E., Shoemaker, S., & Gillevet, P. M.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Frankenfeld, Cara L.
Venue
Annals of Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
736-742.e4
ISSN
1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1823483046
Cited by
123
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
George Mason University Microbiome Analysis Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
high-intensity sweeteners, gut microbiota, aspartame, acesulfame-K, bacterial diversity, bacterial abundance, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Aspartame, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Sweetening Agents, Thiazines, United States, Diet Records, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review