Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on various temperature-indication methods for Li-ion batteries

Open access
Raijmakers, L.H.J., Danilov, D.L., Eichel, R.-A., Notten, P.H.L.·2019·Applied Energy

Abstract

The working principle of Li-ion batteries is explained.• An overview is given on heat generation principles in Li-ion batteries.• All traditional and new battery temperature measurement methods are reviewed.• The challenges in battery temperature measurements are highlighted.• A comparative analysis is made for Li-ion battery temperature measurements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.078

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Raijmakers, L. H. J., Danilov, D. L., Eichel, R.-A., & Notten, P. H. L.
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
240
Pages
918-945
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2915392080
Cited by
424
References
18
FWCI
16.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.