Cited by 37Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiology practices and educationInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Radiologists’ perspectives on the workflow integration of an artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection system: A qualitative study

Open access
Wenderott, Katharina, Krups, Jim, Luetkens, Julian A., Weigl, Matthias·2024·Applied Ergonomics

Abstract

In healthcare, artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to improve work processes, yet most research focuses on the technical features of AI rather than its real-world clinical implementation. To evaluate the implementation process of an AI-based computer-aided detection system (AI-CAD) for prostate MRI readings, we interviewed German radiologists in a pre-post design. We embedded our findings in the Model of Workflow Integration and the Technology Acceptance Model to analyze workflow effects, facilitators, and barriers. The most prominent barriers were: (i) a time delay in the work process, (ii) additional work steps to be taken, and (iii) an unstable performance of the AI-CAD. Most frequently named facilitators were (i) good self-organization, and (ii) good usability of the software. Our results underline the importance of a holistic approach to AI implementation considering the sociotechnical work system and provide valuable insights into key factors of the successful adoption of AI technologies in work systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104243

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wenderott, K., Krups, J., Luetkens, J. A., & Weigl, M.
Affiliations
University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Wenderott, Katharina
Venue
Applied Ergonomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
117
Pages
104243
ISSN
0003-6870 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391433115
Cited by
33
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Ergonomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
AI implementation, computer-aided detection, prostate MRI, workflow integration, technology acceptance model, implementation barriers, implementation facilitators, AI usability
MeSH terms
Radiologists, Artificial Intelligence, Computers, Humans, Male, Software, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review