Cited by 609Nutrition and Health in AgingPhysical Activity and HealthFrailty in Older Adults

Muscular Strength as A Predictor of All-Cause Mortality in an Apparently Healthy Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Data From Approximately 2 Million Men and Women

Open access
García-Hermoso, Antonio, Cavero-Redondo, Iván, Ramírez-Vélez, Robinson, Ruiz, Jonatan R., Ortega, Francisco B., Lee, Duck-Chul, Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente·2018·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objectives The aims of the present systematic review and meta-analysis were to determine the relationship between muscular strength and all-cause mortality risk and to examine the sex-specific impact of muscular strength on all-cause mortality in an apparently healthy population.Data sources Two authors systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and SPORTDiscus databases and conducted manual searching of reference lists of selected articles.Study selection Eligible cohort studies were those that examined the association of muscular strength with all-cause mortality in an apparently healthy population. The hazard ratio (HR) estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled by using random effects meta-analysis models after assessing heterogeneity across studies.Data extraction Two authors independently extracted data.Data synthesis Thirty-eight studies with 1,907,580 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies had a total of 63,087 deaths. Higher levels of handgrip strength were associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR=0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.74) compared with lower muscular strength, with a slightly stronger association in women (HR=0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69) than men (HR=0.69; 95% CI, 0.62-0.77) (all P<.001). Also, adults with higher levels of muscular strength, as assessed by knee extension strength test, had a 14% lower risk of death (HR=0.86: 95% CI, 0.80-0.93; P<.001) compared with adults with lower muscular strength.Conclusions Higher levels of upper- and lower-body muscular strength are associated with a lower risk of mortality in adult population, regardless of age and follow-up period. Muscular strength tests can be easily performed to identify people with lower muscular strength and, consequently, with an increased risk of mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.008

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If optimal or more substantial muscle strength, endurance, and hypertrophy gains are the goal, multiple weekly training sessions are recommended over single weekly sessions, especially for more highly trained or active individuals.

    “Although there is some disagreement [59], if optimal or more substantial muscle strength, endurance, and hypertrophy gains are the goal, then multiple weekly training sessions are recommended over single weekly sessions, especially for the more highly trained or active individuals [19, 25, 26, 30, 49, 51–56].”

    From Minimalist Training: Is Lower Dosage or Intensity Resistance Training Effective to Improve Physical Fitness? A Narrative Review (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The supplied copy’s Methods (section 3.3) describes tests used to measure strength, and its Discussion (section 4) concerns strength and mortality. Searches for weekly training frequency and hypertrophy found no passage comparing multiple sessions with one session or recommending a frequency for highly trained people. The supplied passages are also labelled as a cancer-mortality paper rather than the cited all-cause-mortality paper, so this copy cannot verify the attribution. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Incorporating handgrip strength alongside established cardiovascular disease risk factors significantly enhances the precision of risk prediction for cardiovascular disease morbidity, all-cause mortality, and cancer mortality.

    “incorporating HGS alongside established cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors significantly enhances the precision of risk prediction for CVD morbidity [55], all-cause mortality [56], and cancer mortality [52,56]”
  • Incorporating HGS alongside established CVD risk factors significantly enhances the precision of risk prediction for CVD morbidity, all-cause mortality, and cancer mortality.

    “Numerous studies have shown that incorporating HGS alongside established cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors significantly enhances the precision of risk prediction for CVD morbidity [55], all-cause mortality [56], and cancer mortality [52,56].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Duchowny KA, Peterson MD, Clarke PJ. Cut points for clini- cal muscle weakness among older Americans. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53:63-69.
  2. Lindle R, Metter E, Lynch N, et al. Age and gender comparisons of muscle strength in 654 women and men aged 20-93 yr. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83:1581-1587.
  3. Robsahm TE, Falk RS, Heir T, et al. Measured cardiorespiratory fitness and self-reported physical activity: associations with can- cer risk and death in a long-term prospective cohort study. Cancer Med. 2016;5:2136-2144.
  4. Schmid D, Leitzmann M. Cardiorespiratory fitness as predictor of cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:272-278.
  5. Courneya KS, Segal RJ, McKenzie DC, et al. Effects of exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer outcomes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:1744-1751.
  6. Wu Y, Wang W, Liu T, Zhang D. Association of grip strength with risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases, and can- cer in community-dwelling populations: a meta-analysis of pro- spective cohort studies. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18:551.
  7. Ruiz JR, Sui X, Lobelo F, et al. Muscular strength and adipos- ity as predictors of adulthood cancer mortality in men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1468-1476.
  8. Karlsen T, Nauman J, Dalen H, et al. The combined associa- tion of skeletal muscle strength and physical activity on mor- tality in older women: the HUNT2 study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:710-718.
  9. Dankel S, Loenneke JP, Loprinzi PD. Cancer-specific mortality relative to engagement in muscle strengthening activities and lower extremity strength. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15:144-149.
  10. Wind AE, Takken T, Helders PJ, Engelbert RH. Is grip strength a predictor for total muscle strength in healthy children, adolescents, and young adults? Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:281-287.
  11. Samuel D, Rowe P. An investigation of the association between grip strength and hip and knee joint moments in older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;54:357-360.
  12. Peterson MD, Duchowny K, Meng Q, et al. Low normalized grip strength is a biomarker for cardiometabolic disease and physical disabilities among US and Chinese adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;71:1646-1652.
  13. Meneses-Echávez JF, Correa-Bautista JE, González-Jiménez E, Río-Valle JS, et al. The effect of exercise training on medi- ators of inflammation in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25:1009-1017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García-Hermoso, A., Cavero-Redondo, I., Ramírez-Vélez, R., Ruiz, J. R., Ortega, F. B., Lee, D.-C., & Martínez-Vizcaíno, V.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
99
Issue
10
Pages
2100-2113.e5
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2786503954
Cited by
609
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 28
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Academica-e (Universidad Pública de Navarra) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
muscle strength, all-cause mortality, grip strength, quadriceps strength, sex differences, healthy adults, mortality prediction, muscle strength assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cause of Death, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscular Diseases, Population Surveillance, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Sex Distribution, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review