Cited by 103Ovarian function and disordersEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Psychological benefits of a high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome—A pilot study

Galletly, Cherrie, Moran, Lisa, Noakes, Manny, Clifton, Peter, Tomlinson, Lisa, Norman, Robert·2007·Appetite

Abstract

This study compared the psychological effects of a low-protein high-carbohydrate (LPHC) diet and a high-protein low-carbohydrate (HPLC) diet in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Twenty-five overweight women with PCOS were matched for age, weight, and whether they were trying to conceive. They were randomly allocated to the LPHC or HPLC diet for 16 weeks. All participants attended a weekly exercise, group support and educational program. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale were administered at the beginning and end of the study. The HPLC diet was associated with significant reduction in depression and improvement in self-esteem. There was no change in any psychological measures for the LPHC group. There was no difference in weight loss between the groups. Due to enhanced feelings of well-being, it is possible that HPLC diets may be associated with better compliance and hence be more successful in the long term treatment of obesity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2007.03.222

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galletly, C., Moran, L., Noakes, M., Clifton, P., Tomlinson, L., & Norman, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Galletly, Cherrie
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
590-593
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965120101
Cited by
103
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, high-protein low-carbohydrate diet, low-protein high-carbohydrate diet, obesity, depression, anxiety, self-esteem, psychological well-being, weight loss, dietary adherence, overweight women
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Diet, Reducing, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Female, Humans, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Self Concept, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Diet, Protein-Restricted, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review