The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 45 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Exploratory randomised controlled trial of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention for women
Abstract
To explore the efficacy of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention for women. Sixty-two women (ages 19-64; BMI 22.5-52.1) who were attempting to lose weight were randomised to an intervention or control condition. The former were invited to attend four 2-h workshops, the latter were asked to continue with their normal diets. Data were collected at baseline, 4 and 6 months. BMI, physical activity, mental health. At 6 months intervention participants showed significantly greater increases in physical activity compared to controls (p<.05) but no significant differences in weight loss or mental health. However, when intervention participants who reported 'never' applying the workshop principles at 6 months (n=7) were excluded, results showed both significantly greater increases in physical activity (3.1 sessions per week relative to controls, p<.05) and significantly greater reductions in BMI (0.96 relative to controls, equivalent to 2.32 kg, p<0.5). Reductions in BMI were mediated primarily by reductions in binge eating. Despite its brevity, the intervention was successful at bringing about change. Further refinements should increase its efficacy.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This exploratory RCT tested a brief mindfulness/ACT-based weight-loss intervention in 62 women attempting to lose weight. At 6 months it significantly increased physical activity but did not significantly improve BMI or mental health overall; BMI reductions appeared when participants who never applied the principles were excluded, and these reductions were mediated primarily by reduced binge eating.
Key findings
- In intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant intervention effect on BMI, F(1, 60)=1.59, p=.21, or mental health difficulties, F(1, 60)=1.29, p=.26, but a significant effect on physical activity, F(1, 60)=6.63, p<.013.
- In the intervention-efficacy analysis excluding non-attenders, intervention participants showed significantly greater increases in physical activity, t(44)=2.46, p=.018, but no significant BMI difference, t(45)=1.40, p=.17.
- Excluding intervention participants who reported “never” applying workshop principles at 6 months (n=7), BMI reductions were significantly greater in the intervention group, t(38)=2.24, p=.031, equivalent to 2.32 kg relative to controls, and physical activity increases were significantly greater, t(38)=2.36, p=.023.
- BMI change was mediated primarily by reductions in binge eating: BMI change correlated with binge-eating change (0.45, p<.05), and hierarchical regression suggested the intervention effect on BMI was largely, but not wholly, brought about by reductions in binge eating.
Methods
- Randomised controlled trial of 62 women aged 19–64 with BMI 22.5–52.1 who were attempting to lose weight; participants were stratified by BMI and medical conditions and allocated to an intervention or control condition.
- Intervention participants were invited to four 2-hour mindfulness/ACT-based workshops over three consecutive weeks plus a follow-up session about three months later; controls were asked to continue their normal diets. Data were collected at baseline, 4 months, and 6 months.
- Main outcomes were BMI, physical activity (BPAT), and mental health (GHQ-12); hypothesised mediators included emotional/external eating (DEBQ), emotional eating (EEQ), binge eating (BES), acceptance/action (AAQ-II), and dietary adherence. Analyses included intention-to-treat MANOVA, follow-up tests, efficacy analyses excluding non-attenders, correlations, and hierarchical regression for mediation.
Limitations
- The paper states it was an exploratory trial; future evaluations should include a standard rather than no-treatment control, extend beyond 6 months, and account for clustering effects because the intervention was delivered in groups.
- The paper also states the intervention and control groups were not well-matched for physical activity and binge eating at baseline, so results for these variables need replication.
- Evident from the text: the sample was small (62 randomised; efficacy analyses used 23 intervention and 24 controls; moderator analysis used 16 intervention and 24 controls), and several mediator/moderator measures relied on self-report.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 45 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but no significant differences in weight loss or mental health”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 2Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but no significant differences in weight loss or mental health”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At 6 months intervention participants showed significantly greater increases in physical activity compared to controls (p<.05)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, when intervention participants who reported 'never' applying the workshop principles at 6 months (n=7) were excluded, results showed both significantly greater increases in physical activity (3.1 sessions per week relative to controls, p<.05)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Excluding intervention participants who reported 'never' applying the workshop principles at 6 months yields a valid estimate of intervention efficacy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and significantly greater reductions in BMI (0.96 relative to controls, equivalent to 2.32kg, p<0.5)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Excluding intervention participants who reported 'never' applying the workshop principles at 6 months yields a valid estimate of intervention efficacy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but a significant effect on physical activity, F(1, 60) = 6.63, p<.013.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Missing data are missing at random, so that replacing missing values with the mean change from the control group is valid.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but no significant improvement in fit with the addition of the intervention (R 2 = 0.31, p=.15).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results showed a significant effect of binge eating change (R 2 = 0.26, β = 0.51, p<.001)”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“or on mental health difficulties, F(1, 60) = 1.29, p = 0.26”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Missing data are missing at random, so that replacing missing values with the mean change from the control group is valid.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but no significant correlations with change in external eating, EEQ emotional eating, AAQ and dietary adherence.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 29
- The quote only partly states this claim. 4
- Probably not a substantial claim. 22
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“intervention participants showed a greater reduction in binge eating compared to control participants but there were no other significant differences.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Qualitative data suggested that the most successful part was the cognitive defusion component, with participants finding it particularly useful in relation to exercise.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“2.50 (4.88) and -0.61 (3.34) respectively for physical activity”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and showing a relative increase in physical activity of 2.81 sessions per week.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effect sizes for changes over the 6 month duration were small for BMI and GHQ and moderate for physical activity (see Table 4).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Excluding intervention participants who reported 'never' applying the workshop principles at 6 months yields a valid estimate of intervention efficacy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Relative reductions in BMI in the workshop condition were equivalent to 2.32kg.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the intervention had no significant impact on emotional eating, external eating or psychological flexibility.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These showed no significant effect of the intervention on BMI, F(1, 60) = 1.59, p = 0.21”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Missing data are missing at random, so that replacing missing values with the mean change from the control group is valid.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the data were re-analysed excluding those who reported 'never' using the workshop techniques at 6 months these figures rose to 2.32kg and 3.11 activity sessions per week.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For BMI change results showed significant correlations with change in DEBQ emotional eating (0.35, p<.05) and binge eating (0.45, p<.05)”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All means were in the predicted directions with BMI going down in the intervention group relative to the control group, physical activity showing an increase in the intervention group compared to a reduction in the control group and recent mental heath difficulties going down in the intervention group and up in the control group (see Table 4).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Missing data are missing at random, so that replacing missing values with the mean change from the control group is valid.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Relative reductions in BMI in the intervention condition were equivalent to 1.35kg and increases in physical activity equivalent to 2.8 sessions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Excluding intervention participants who reported 'never' applying the workshop principles at 6 months yields a valid estimate of intervention efficacy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the changes for BMI and mental health were relatively minor with small treatment effect sizes. Physical activity showed a slightly larger change with a moderate treatment effect size (see Table 4).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Missing data are missing at random, so that replacing missing values with the mean change from the control group is valid.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results showed a trend towards significance, F (1, 58) = 2.31, p = .086.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Missing data are missing at random, so that replacing missing values with the mean change from the control group is valid.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Of particular note is that in these cases ACT appeared to be as or more effective than traditional approaches when it came to the maintenance of behavioural changes (Gifford et al., 2004; Hayes, Wilson et al., 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gifford et al., 2004 source
- Not checked yetcites Hayes, Wilson et al., 2004
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If this is the case, emotional eating can be viewed as a form of experiential avoidance.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is evidence to suggest that obesity is associated with both emotional eating and external eating .”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although a growing number of interventions are now incorporating components aimed at this (e.g., Cooper & Fairburn, 2001; Rapoport, Clark & Wardle, 2000), the development of these still falls far short of that achieved in areas such as nicotine and alcohol dependence to which obesity has been compared (House of Commons Health Committee, 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites House of Commons Health Committee, 2004
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus knowing how to lose weight is simply not sufficient, we also need to tackle the psychological processes that lead to behaviours associated with weight gain.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, experts are increasingly recognising the need to address the psychological aspects of obesity (e.g., Byrne, 2002; Cooper & Fairburn, 2001; House of Commons Health Committee, 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Byrne, 2002 source
- Not checked yetcites Cooper & Fairburn, 2001
- Not checked yetcites House of Commons Health Committee, 2004
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“In addition, a study by Blair et al., (1990) found significant associations between levels of emotional eating and weight loss success; successful weight control was associated with decreases in emotional eating between baseline and a 1 year follow-up and with low levels of emotional eating at both time points.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Blair et al., (1990) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, unsuccessful weight control was associated with increases between baseline and follow-up and with high levels at both time points.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Blair et al., (1990) source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“KT was not involved in recruitment and was blind to participant identities.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nearly half the sample (48%) attended all four workshops whilst three-quarters (74%) attended two of the four workshops.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 31Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants were allocated to the intervention and control conditions using a stratified randomisation protocol on the basis of BMI and the existence of medical conditions likely to effect weight (since these variables were considered most likely to influence study outcomes).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown, there were no significant differences in BMI, age (though intervention participants were, on average, slightly older than control participants), level of education, % of participants with medical conditions affecting their weight, % of participants attending formal slimming clubs, number of previous diet attempts, or length spent on current diet.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The AAQ-II has been shown to have good construct, concurrent, predictive and discriminant validity (Bond et al., submitted).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bond et al., submitted
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the intervention group reported higher levels of binge eating, and lower levels of physical activity, at baseline”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · p. 23 · plain
“the intervention and control groups were not well-matched for physical activity and binge eating at baseline.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · p. 23 · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attendance was highest at the start of the programme for Workshops 1 and 2 (n=25 and 24 respectively) and dropped off for Workshops 3 and 4 (n=18 and 16 respectively).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 25Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 31 people randomised to the workshop condition, 26 attended one or more of the workshops, 1 attended half a workshop and 4 failed to attend any workshops.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 31Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the present study was designed as an exploratory trial only”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“JI, KT and CS had all attended a range of ACT training workshops and, as an informal assessment of treatment integrity, eight of the 12 workshops were observed by either KT or CS. During these sessions no problems relating to treatment integrity were identified.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All data were collected by assistants who were blind to participant group allocation and who were otherwise uninvolved in the project.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“qualitative data suggested that intervention participants coped better after breaking their diet (for example by avoiding prolonged feelings of guilt and thoughts of failure) which may have helped interrupt previous patterns of diet lapses leading to binge eating episodes (Ogden & Wardle, 1991).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ogden & Wardle, 1991
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It has been shown to have moderate testretest reliability; fair to moderate concurrent validity and poor to fair criterion validity (Smith et al., 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Smith et al., 2005 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The DEBQ has been shown to have satisfactory to good reliability, excellent factorial validity and satisfactory concurrent and discriminant validity (Van Strien et al., 1986; Wardle, 1987).”
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Following Pocock (1983), computer-generated random numbers were used to order intervention and control group allocation within each block.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pocock (1983)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Internal reliability was moderate at baseline (alpha=0.47, n=62) but acceptable (alpha=0.62) with the exclusion of item 6 (happiness). Thus item 6 was excluded from all subsequent analyses.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 62Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Likewise, failure to adhere to exercise and healthy eating plans may be prompted by rationalisations about, for example, being more conscientious the next day or there being exceptional circumstances that justify the relapse.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“JI was blind to the number of strata and block sizes employed within the randomisation list.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The scale showed acceptable internal reliability at baseline (alpha=0.74, n=62).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 62Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, participants in the intervention group reported starting dieting at a significantly older age than those in the control group (25 versus 20 years respectively, p<.05).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus applied to the above cognitions it may help individuals refrain from bouts of overeating and adhere to exercise and eating plans.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Missing data are missing at random, so that replacing missing values with the mean change from the control group is valid.
“missing data were replaced by calculating the mean change from previous observations in the control group and adding or subtracting this figure from the previous observation relating to the missing data point.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Excluding intervention participants who reported 'never' applying the workshop principles at 6 months yields a valid estimate of intervention efficacy.
“when intervention participants who reported 'never' applying the workshop principles at 6 months (n=7) were excluded, results showed both significantly greater increases in physical activity”
The paper relies on this without support.
Self-reported application of workshop principles at 6 months accurately reflects actual use.
“the extent to which participants reported still applying the workshop principles at 6 months”
The paper relies on this without support.
The present study is the first attempt to adapt mindfulness-based techniques for a programme designed exclusively for weight loss.
“As far as we are aware the present study is the first attempt to adapt mindfulness based techniques for a programme designed exclusively for weight loss.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Findings on weight loss after mindfulness have been mixed, with some31–37 but not all38,39 studies reporting improvements in weight.”
From A Mindfulness-Based Intervention to Control Weight After Bariatric Surgery: Preliminary Results From a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial (2016) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“In another workshop study, 62 women were randomized to four 2-hour ACT workshops or to a control condition. At 6 months, ACT participants, relative to control, showed increases in PA and decreases in BMI, at least when nonparticipating participants were excluded.19”
From The mind your health project: a randomized controlled trial of an innovative behavioral treatment for obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“These findings are consistent with previously reported improvements in weight outcomes when incorporating acceptance-based skills in workshops targeting overweight and obesity.18,19”
From The mind your health project: a randomized controlled trial of an innovative behavioral treatment for obesity (2013) · cites this paper as [19]
Statistics that don’t add up
Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.
Inconsistent p-value: F (1, 58) = 2.31, p = .086
MinorThe paper reports p = .086 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .134. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .086 · recomputed p = .134
“F (1, 58) = 2.31, p = .086”
Inconsistent p-value: F(3, 41)=2.54, p = .054
MinorThe paper reports p = .054 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .070. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .054 · recomputed p = .070
“F(3, 41)=2.54, p=.054”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Doesn’t add upF(1, 58) = 2.31reported p = .086 · recomputed p = .134
“F (1, 58) = 2.31, p = .086”
- Doesn’t add upF(3, 41) = 2.54reported p = .054 · recomputed p = .070
“F(3, 41)=2.54, p = .054”
- ConsistentF(1, 60) = 1.59reported p = .21 · recomputed p = .212
“F(1, 60) = 1.59, p = .21”
- ConsistentF(1, 60) = 1.29reported p = .26 · recomputed p = .261
“F(1, 60) = 1.29, p = .26”
- Consistentt(44) = 2.46reported p = .018 · recomputed p = .018
“t(44)=2.46, p = .018”
- Consistentt(45) = 1.4reported p = .17 · recomputed p = .168
“t(45)=1.40, p = .17”
- Consistentt(45) = 0.87reported p = .39 · recomputed p = .389
“t(45)=0.87, p = .39”
- Consistentt(38) = 2.24reported p = .031 · recomputed p = .031
“t(38)=2.24, p = .031”
- Consistentt(38) = 2.36reported p = .023 · recomputed p = .024
“t(38)=2.36, p = .023”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e565682010-001 · Cited by 9,453
Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., et al. (2004) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077 · Cited by 7,234
Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 · Cited by 6,587
Self-citation(1999) · Cited by 5,934
The Disease Burden Associated With Overweight and Obesity
Must, A. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.16.1523 · Cited by 4,827
The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
Stunkard, A. J., & Messick, S. (1985) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8 · Cited by 4,687
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
Campbell, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694 · Cited by 3,474 · cited 1×
“Following recommendations for the development and evaluation of complex health interventions (Campbell et al., 2000), the aim of the current study was to conduct an exploratory trial of the effectiveness of a brief ACT-based group intervention.”
InfluentialPrevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy.
Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., Ridgeway, V. A., Soulsby, J. M., & Lau, M. A. (2000) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.68.4.615 · Cited by 3,236
Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach.
Hill, I. D., & Pocock, S. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531186 · Cited by 2,918
(1998) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/68.4.899 · Cited by 2,722
The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons
Gormally, J., Black, S., Daston, S., & Rardin, D. (1982) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(82)90024-7 · Cited by 2,129
Long-term maintenance of weight loss: Current status.
Jeffery, R. W., Epstein, L. H., Wilson, G. T., Drewnowski, A., Stunkard, A. J., & Wing, R. R. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.suppl1.5 · Cited by 1,093
Clinical trials: A practical approach
Daly, M. J. (1984) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0165-6147(84)90515-7 · Cited by 1,057
Bach, P., & Hayes, S. C. (2002) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.70.5.1129 · Cited by 839
Mediators of change in emotion-focused and problem-focused worksite stress management interventions
Bond, F. W., & Bunce, D. (2000) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.156 · Cited by 607
Self-citationGiving in to Feel Good: The Place of Emotion Regulation in the Context of General Self-Control
Tice, D. M., & Bratslavsky, E. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1103_03 · Cited by 569
Acceptance-based treatment for smoking cessation
Gifford, E. V., Kohlenberg, B. S., Hayes, S. C., Antonuccio, D. O., Piasecki, M. M., Rasmussen-Hall, M. L., & Palm, K. M. (2004) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80015-7 · Cited by 499
Maintenance and relapse after weight loss in women: behavioral aspects
Kayman, S., Bruvold, W. H., & Stern, J. (1990) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/52.5.800 · Cited by 433
What predicts weight regain in a group of successful weight losers?
McGuire, M. T., Wing, R. R., Klem, M. L., Lang, W., & Hill, J. O. (1999) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.67.2.177 · Cited by 412
Masheb, R., & Grilo, C. (2006) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20221 · Cited by 386
Kramer, F. M., Jeffery, R. W., Forster, J. L., & Snell, M. K. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 378
Braet, C., & van Strien, T. (1997) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00045-4 · Cited by 377
Food craving, dietary restraint and mood
Hill, A. J., Weaver, C. F. L., & Blundell, J. E. (1991) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(91)90021-j · Cited by 353
Self-citationDBT, FAP, and ACT: How empirically oriented are the new behavior therapy technologies?
Hayes, S. C., Masuda, A., Bissett, R., Luoma, J., & Guerrero, L. F. (2004) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80003-0 · Cited by 342 · cited 1×
“Of particular note is that in these cases ACT appeared to be as or more effective than traditional approaches when it came to the maintenance of behavioural changes (Gifford et al., 2004; Hayes et al., 2004).”
Wardle, J. (1987) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(87)90072-9 · Cited by 324
A new cognitive behavioural approach to the treatment of obesity.
Cooper, Z., & Fairburn, C. (2001) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00065-6 · Cited by 307
Eating behavior correlates of adult weight gain and obesity in healthy women aged 55–65 y
Hays, N. P., Bathalon, G. P., McCrory, M. A., Roubenoff, R., Lipman, R., & Roberts, S. B. (2002) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/75.3.476 · Cited by 286
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Bissett, R., Piasecki, M., Batten, S. V., Byrd, M., & Gregg, J. (2004) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80014-5 · Cited by 283 · cited 1×
“Of particular note is that in these cases ACT appeared to be as or more effective than traditional approaches when it came to the maintenance of behavioural changes (Gifford et al., 2004; Hayes et al., 2004).”
Using motivational interviewing as a supplement to obesity treatment: A stepped-care approach.
Carels, R. A., Darby, L., Cacciapaglia, H. M., Konrad, K., Coit, C., Harper, J., Kaplar, M. E., Young, K., Baylen, C. A., & Versland, A. (2007) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.3.369 · Cited by 199
Screening for Physical Activity in Family PracticeEvaluation of Two Brief Assessment Tools
SMITH, B., MARSHALL, A., & HUANG, N. (2005) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.07.005 · Cited by 192
Psychological and Behavioral Correlates of Baseline BMI in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)
Delahanty, L. M., Meigs, J. B., Hayden, D. L., Williamson, D. A., & Nathan, D. M. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.11.1992 · Cited by 189
Eating style and eating behaviour in adolescents
Wardle, J., Marsland, L., Sheikh, Y., Quinn, M., Fedoroff, I., & Ogden, J. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90195-c · Cited by 173
Evaluation of a modified cognitive-behavioural programme for weight management
Rapoport, L., Clark, M., & Wardle, J. (2000) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801465 · Cited by 141
On the relationship between emotional and external eating behavior
van Strien, T., Schippers, G. M., & Cox, W. M. (1995) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(95)00018-8 · Cited by 137
Psychological aspects of weight maintenance and relapse in obesity
Byrne, S. M. (2002) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00487-7 · Cited by 135
Does emotional eating interfere with success in attempts at weight control?
Blair, A. J., Lewis, V. J., & Booth, D. A. (1990) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(90)90047-c · Cited by 106 · cited 2×
“In addition, a study by Blair et al. (1990) found significant associations between levels of emotional eating and weight loss success; successful weight control was associated with decreases in emotional eating between baseline and a 1 year follow-up and with low levels of emotional eating at both…”
Metzler, C. W., Biglan, A., Noell, J., Ary, D. V., & Ochs, L. (2000) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(00)80003-9 · Cited by 79
Physical activity of moderate intensity in leisure time and the risk of all cause mortality
Bucksch, J. (2005) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.015768 · Cited by 67
One-year follow-up effects of two obesity treatments on psychological well-being and weight
Nauta, H., Hospers, H., & Jansen, A. (2001) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910701169205 · Cited by 64
Habits and implementation intentions
Verplanken, B. (2005) · Cited by 44
Physiological and psychological responses to a glucose challenge in bulimia
Blouin, A. G., Blouin, J., Braaten, J. T., Sarwar, G., Bushnik, T. L., & Walker, J. (1991) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/1098-108x(199105)10:3 · Cited by 16
Hansel, S. L., & Wittrock, D. A. (1997) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199701)21:1
van Strien (1986) · doi:10.1002/1098-108x(198602)5:2
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Orcutt, H. K., & Waltz, T., et al. (under review). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance.
- House of Commons Health Committee, 2004, Vol. 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hölzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611419671 · Cited by 3,024
Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density
Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., & Lazar, S. W. (2011) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006 · Cited by 1,914
Samdal, G. B., Eide, G. E., Barth, T., Williams, G., & Meland, E. (2017) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0494-y · Cited by 788
Mindfulness‐based interventions for obesity‐related eating behaviours: a literature review
O'Reilly, G. A., Cook, L., Spruijt‐Metz, D., & Black, D. S. (2014) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12156 · Cited by 547
(2010) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · Cited by 542
Metadata
- Authors
- Tapper, K., Shaw, C., Ilsley, J., Hill, A. J., Bond, F. W., & Moore, L.
- Affiliations
- Swansea University (GB)
- University of Glamorgan (GB)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Tapper, Katy
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 396-404
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131107593
- Semantic Scholar
- 931b1eefd6b7960d6a8e9827cb76949776128cf6
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Appetite (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007543/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- mindfulness-based interventions, weight loss, women, binge eating, physical activity, body mass index, mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Awareness, Bulimia, Energy Intake, Cognition, Emotions, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Patient Selection, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review