Cited by 412Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

What predicts weight regain in a group of successful weight losers?

McGuire, Maureen T., Wing, Rena R., Klem, Mary L., Lang, Wei, Hill, James O.·1999·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This study identified predictors of weight gain versus continued maintenance among individuals already successful at long-term weight loss. Weight, behavior, and psychological information was collected on entry into the study and 1 year later. Thirty-five percent gained weight over the year of follow-up, and 59% maintained their weight losses. Risk factors for weight regain included more recent weight losses (less than 2 years vs. 2 years or more), larger weight losses (greater than 30% of maximum weight vs. less than 30%), and higher levels of depression, dietary disinhibition, and binge eating levels at entry into the registry. Over the year of follow-up, gainers reported greater decreases in energy expenditure and greater increases in percentage of calories from fat. Gainers also reported greater decreases in restraint and increases in hunger, dietary disinhibition, and binge eating. This study suggests that several years of successful weight maintenance increase the probability of future weight maintenance and that weight regain is due at least in part to failure to maintain behavior changes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.67.2.177

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGuire, M. T., Wing, R. R., Klem, M. L., Lang, W., & Hill, J. O.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1999
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
177-185
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2136317611
Cited by
412
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 20
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
weight regain, weight loss maintenance, long-term weight loss, predictors of weight gain, depression, binge eating, energy expenditure, dietary fat intake, hunger, behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Diet, Reducing, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Weight Gain, Weight Loss, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review