The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, instruments used to measure cyberbullying often do not align with the conceptualization of cyberbullying and lack adequate reliability and validity testing (50, 51).”
From A thematic analysis of adolescents’ perceptions of cyberbullying and cyberaggression: definitional distinctions and educational gaps (2026) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“Debate about the application of these criteria to cyberbullying is ongoing and the absence of consensus on the conceptualization and operation of the phenomenon has hindered efforts to understand and address it (Berne et al., 2013;Deschamps & McNutt, 2016;Dooley, Pyzalski, & Cross, 2009;Kota, Schoohs, Benson, & Moreno, 2014;Kowalski et al., 2014;Langos, 2012;Menesini & Nocentini, 2009;Peter & Pet”
From Young people’s conceptualizations of the nature of cyberbullying: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research (2020) · cites this paper as Berne et al., 2013
Citations
Cites
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (1989) · Cited by 9,595
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x · Cited by 3,639
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014 · Cited by 2,566
Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Suicide
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2010.494133 · Cited by 2,078
Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying?
SLONJE, R., & SMITH, P. K. (2008) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x · Cited by 1,844
Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard: A Preliminary Look at Cyberbullying
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006) · Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice · doi:10.1177/1541204006286288 · Cited by 1,701
Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639620701457816 · Cited by 1,497
Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x · Cited by 1,313
(2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315812397 · Cited by 1,106
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- *Katzer, 2009, Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in internet chatrooms and victimization in school, Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 25, 10.1300/J202v06n03_06 · DOI · Paper page
- *Pyżalski, 2009, Poster in workshop
- *Salvatore, A. J. (2006). An anti-bullying strategy: Action research in a 5/6 intermediate school (Doctoral dissertation), University of Hartford. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Livingstone, S., & Smith, P. K. (2014) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12197 · Cited by 590
Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del Rey, R. (2015) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001 · Cited by 439
Rey, R. D., Casas, J. A., Ruiz, R. O., Schultze‐Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P. K., Thompson, F., Barkoukis, V., Tsorbatzoudis, H., Brighi, A., et al. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.065 · Cited by 444
Self-citationSome Problems with Cyberbullying Research
Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.012 · Cited by 373
Selkie, E. M., Fales, J. L., & Moreno, M. A. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.026 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Berne, S., Frisén, A., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Naruskov, K., Luik, P., Katzer, C., Erentaite, R., & Zukauskiene, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- University of Tartu (EE)
- Corresponding author
- Berne, S.
- Venue
- Aggression and Violent Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 320-334
- ISSN
- 1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987146572
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Keywords
- cyberbullying, assessment instruments, psychometric properties, validity, reliability statistics, online harassment, conceptual definitions, instrument selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
