Cited by 83Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationFace Recognition and Perception

Automatic imitation of intransitive actions

Open access
Press, Clare, Bird, Geoffrey, Walsh, Eamonn, Heyes, Cecilia·2008·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

Previous research has indicated a potential discontinuity between monkey and human ventral premotor-parietal mirror systems, namely that monkey mirror systems process only transitive (object-directed) actions, whereas human mirror systems may also process intransitive (non-object-directed) actions. The present study investigated this discontinuity by seeking evidence of automatic imitation of intransitive actions--hand opening and closing--in humans using a simple reaction time (RT), stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Left-right and up-down spatial compatibility were controlled by ensuring that stimuli were presented and responses executed in orthogonal planes, and automatic imitation was isolated from simple and complex orthogonal spatial compatibility by varying the anatomical identity of the stimulus hand and response hemispace, respectively. In all conditions, action compatible responding was faster than action incompatible responding, and no effects of spatial compatibility were observed. This experiment therefore provides evidence of automatic imitation of intransitive actions, and support for the hypothesis that human and monkey mirror systems differ with respect to the processing of intransitive actions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.11.001

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The object-directedness difference probably does not affect the overall results, since the human MNS responds to transitive and intransitive actions and automatic imitation occurs for both.

    “While it would be ideal for responses to be similar on this dimension, this seems less likely to effect the overall results, given that the human mirror neuron system responds to both transitive and intransitive actions (Rizzolatti and Craighero, 2004) and that automatic imitation has also been demonstrated for both transitive and intransitive actions (Press et al., 2008; Bertenthal et al. 2006).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Iacoboni, M., Kubota, K., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Woods, R.P., Dubeau, M.C., Mazziota, J.C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2001). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 13995-13999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Press, C., Bird, G., Walsh, E., & Heyes, C.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Press, Clare
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
44-50
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071210584
Cited by
83
References
42
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-538-28-1001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
automatic imitation, mirror system, transitive actions, stimulus-response compatibility, reaction time, human-monkey comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Automatism, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Functional Laterality, Male, Motor Neurons, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Spatial Behavior, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review