Cited by 656Stress Responses and CortisolRegulation of Appetite and ObesityEating Disorders and Behaviors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic stress and comfort foods: self-medication and abdominal obesity

Dallman, Mary F., Pecoraro, Norman C., la Fleur, Susanne E.·2005·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Central corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) networks are recruited by chronic stressors and elevated glucocorticoids (GCs) that initiate recruitment of central CRF activity in the amygdala. Increased central activity of the CRF network stimulates all monoaminergic cell groups, as well as premotor autonomic and other limbic structures resulting in the typical arousal, behavioral changes, autonomic, and neuroendocrine changes that accompany the chronic imposition of a stressor. By contrast, elevated GCs appear, through a variety of means to counteract the effects of central CRF, which they have initiated. Together with insulin, the GCs stimulate drive for and ingestion of "comfort foods" that may directly result in reduction of the negative effects of the chronic stressor in the nucleus Accumbens, through stimulation of the anterior, more pleasure-associated part of this cell group, thus reducing the weight of the stress-stimulated posterior, more defensive part. Furthermore, the shift in caloric intake from chow to preference for "comfort foods," together with elevated GCs and insulin, reorganize energy stores from a peripheral to a central distribution, primarily as abdominal fat. A signal associated with this fat depot appears, as with eating "comfort foods," to reduce the influence of the chronic stress network on behaviors, autonomic, and neuroendocrine outflow.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2004.11.004

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 656

Metadata

Authors
Dallman, M. F., Pecoraro, N. C., & la Fleur, S. E.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Dallman, Mary F.
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
275-280
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100183198
Cited by
656
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 41
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-16944, R01DA016944)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK28172)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
chronic stress, comfort food, self-medication, abdominal obesity, corticotropin-releasing factor, glucocorticoids, insulin, nucleus accumbens, amygdala, energy homeostasis, energy intake
MeSH terms
Animals, Chronic Disease, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Eating, Food Preferences, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Limbic System, Macaca mulatta, Neural Pathways, Obesity, Self Medication, Stress, Physiological, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review