Cited by 316Music Therapy and HealthNeuroscience and Music PerceptionStress Responses and Cortisol

The psychoneuroimmunological effects of music: A systematic review and a new model

Fancourt, Daisy, Ockelford, Adam, Belai, Abi·2014·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

There has been a growing interest over the past decade into the health benefits of music, in particular examining its psychological and neurological effects. Yet this is the first attempt to systematically review publications on the psychoneuroimmunology of music. Of the selected sixty-three studies published over the past 22 years, a range of effects of music on neurotransmitters, hormones, cytokines, lymphocytes, vital signs and immunoglobulins as well as psychological assessments are cataloged. Research so far points to the pivotal role of stress pathways in linking music to an immune response. However, several challenges to this research are noted: (1) there is very little discussion on the possible mechanisms by which music is achieving its neurological and immunological impact; (2) the studies tend to examine biomarkers in isolation, without taking into consideration the interaction of the biomarkers in question with other physiological or metabolic activities of the body, leading to an unclear understanding of the impact that music may be having; (3) terms are not being defined clearly enough, such as distinctions not being made between different kinds of stress and 'music' being used to encompass a broad spectrum of activities without determining which aspects of musical engagement are responsible for alterations in biomarkers. In light of this, a new model is presented which provides a framework for developing a taxonomy of musical and stress-related variables in research design, and tracing the broad pathways that are involved in its influence on the body.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.10.014

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 111 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fancourt, D., Ockelford, A., & Belai, A.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Music (GB)
  • University of Roehampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Fancourt, Daisy
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
36
Pages
15-26
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997508718
Cited by
316
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
music, psychoneuroimmunology, stress response pathways, immune response, neurotransmitters, hormones, cytokines, lymphocytes, immunoglobulins, vital signs, biomarkers, music and health
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Neurological, Music, Music Therapy, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Neuroimmunomodulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review