Cited by 512Stress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Parallel circuits mediating distinct emotional coping reactions to different types of stress

Keay, Kevin A., Bandler, Richard·2001·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

All animals, including humans, react with distinct emotional coping strategies to different types of stress. Active coping strategies (e.g. confrontation, fight, escape) are evoked if the stressor is controllable or escapable. Passive coping strategies (e.g. quiescence, immobility, decreased responsiveness to the environment) are usually elicited if the stressor is inescapable and help to facilitate recovery and healing. Neural substrates mediating active versus passive emotional coping have been identified within distinct, longitudinal neuronal columns of the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) region. Active coping is evoked by activation of either the dorsolateral or lateral columns of the PAG; whereas passive coping is triggered by activation of the ventrolateral PAG. Recent anatomical studies indicate that each PAG column receives a distinctive set of ascending (spinal and medullary) and descending (prefrontal cortical and hypothalamic) afferents. Consistent with the anatomy, functional studies using immediate early gene expression (c-fos) as a marker of neuronal activation have revealed that the preferential activation of a specific PAG column reflects (i) the type of emotional coping reaction triggered, and (ii) whether a physical or psychological stressor was used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00049-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Flight or fight is mediated through the lateral periaqueductal gray (LPAG), which activates the basic, stereotypical motor patterns of flight or fight-for example, attack, running, treading, burying.

    “Flight or fight is mediated through the lateral periaqueductal gray (LPAG), which activates the basic, stereotypical motor patterns of flight or fight—for example, attack, running, treading, burying (see Figures 1 and 2).24,28,47,48”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [28]

  • The LPAG activates premotor centers in the pons and medulla, which then activate motor networks in the spinal cord or brain stem.

    “The LPAG, in turn, activates premotor centers in the pons and medulla, which then activate motor networks in the spinal cord or brain stem.28,47”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Activation of autonomic centers in the dorsal hypothalamus causes a generalized sympathetic response that includes activation of the heart and increased vascular resistance in the viscera, which increases perfusion pressure of tissues, especially muscles, heart, and brain.

    “Activation of autonomic centers in the dorsal hypothalamus causes a generalized sympathetic response that includes activation of the heart (increased heart rate and cardiac output) and increased vascular resistance in the viscera, which increases the perfusion pressure of tissues, especially the muscles, heart, and brain.24,28”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Flight or fight involves non-opioid analgesia, which can be evoked by activation of the LPAG, and projections to the spinal cord block ascending pain signals.

    “Flight or fight involves non-opioid analgesia,28,29 which can be evoked by activation of the LPAG.28 Projections to the spinal cord block ascending pain signals.30”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Non-opioid analgesia accompanies the active defense responses (flight or fight), and opioid analgesia accompanies the passive defense responses (freezing, tonic immobility, collapsed immobility, and quiescent immobility).

    “Non-opioid analgesia accompanies the “active” defense responses (flight or fight), and opioid analgesia accompanies the “passive” defense responses (freezing, tonic immobility, collapsed immobility, and quiescent immobility).28–30”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keay, K. A., & Bandler, R.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Bandler, Richard
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-12
Volume
25
Issue
7-8
Pages
669-678
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006563521
Cited by
512
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
emotional coping, stress, periaqueductal gray, active coping, passive coping, immobility, Fos expression, neuronal activation, midbrain, psychological stress, physical stress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Animals, Emotions, Humans, Nerve Net, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review