Cited by 92Gut microbiota and healthTryptophan and brain disordersAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

Antibiotics and the nervous system: More than just the microbes?

Champagne-Jorgensen, Kevin, Kunze, Wolfgang A., Forsythe, Paul, Bienenstock, John, McVey Neufeld, Karen-Anne·2019·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

The use of antibiotics has recently risen to prominence in neuroscience due to their potential value in studying the microbiota-gut-brain axis. In this context they have been largely employed to illustrate the many influences of the gut microbiota on brain function and behaviour. Much of this research is bolstered by the abnormal behaviour seen in germ-free animals and other well-controlled experiments. However, this literature has largely failed to consider the neuroactive potential of antibiotics themselves, independent from, or in addition to, their microbicidal effects. This is problematic, as clinical as well as experimental literature, largely neglected through the past decade, has clearly demonstrated that broad classes of antibiotics are neuroactive or neurotoxic. This is true even for some antibiotics that are widely regarded as not absorbed in the intestinal tract, and is especially concerning when considering the highly-concentrated and widely-ranging doses that have been used. In this review we will critically survey the clinical and experimental evidence that antibiotics may influence a variety of nervous system functions, from the enteric nervous system through to the brain and resultant behaviour. We will discuss substantial evidence which clearly suggests neuro-activity or -toxicity by most classes of antibiotics. We will conclude that, while evidence for the microbiota-gut-brain axis remains strong, clinical and experimental studies which employ antibiotics t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.12.014

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antibiotic-induced ablation of the gut microbiota in rodents results in long-term effects on neurochemistry and behavior.

    “antibiotic-induced ablation of the gut microbiota in rodents results in long-term effects on neurochemistry and behavior (Champagne-Jorgensen et al., 2019;Desbonnet et al., 2015;Guida et al., 2018;Neufeld et al., 2011)”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Champagne-Jorgensen et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Champagne-Jorgensen, K., Kunze, W. A., Forsythe, P., Bienenstock, J., & McVey Neufeld, K.-A.
Affiliations
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
Corresponding author
Bienenstock, John
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
77
Pages
7-15
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905767677
Cited by
92
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CIHR
  • CAG
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Keywords
antibiotics, neurotoxicity, microbiota-gut-brain axis, gut microbiota, germ-free animals, enteric nervous system, behavior
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Brain, Central Nervous System, Central Nervous System Depressants, Humans, Intestines, Nervous System, Enteric Nervous System, Gastrointestinal Tract, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review