Cited by 91Gastrointestinal motility and disordersVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The gut-brain axis rewired: adding a functional vagal nicotinic “sensory synapse”

Perez‐Burgos, Azucena, Mao, Yu‐Kang, Bienenstock, John, Kunze, Wolfgang A.·2014·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

It is generally accepted that intestinal sensory vagal fibers are primary afferent, responding nonsynaptically to luminal stimuli. The gut also contains intrinsic primary afferent neurons (IPANs) that respond to luminal stimuli. A psychoactive Lactobacillus rhamnosus (JB-1) that affects brain function excites both vagal fibers and IPANs. We wondered whether, contrary to its primary afferent designation, the sensory vagus response to JB-1 might depend on IPAN to vagal fiber synaptic transmission. We recorded ex vivo single- and multiunit afferent action potentials from mesenteric nerves supplying mouse jejunal segments. Intramural synaptic blockade with Ca(2+) channel blockers reduced constitutive or JB-1-evoked vagal sensory discharge. Firing of 60% of spontaneously active units was reduced by synaptic blockade. Synaptic or nicotinic receptor blockade reduced firing in 60% of vagal sensory units that were stimulated by luminal JB-1. In control experiments, increasing or decreasing IPAN excitability, respectively increased or decreased nerve firing that was abolished by synaptic blockade or vagotomy. We conclude that >50% of vagal afferents function as interneurons for stimulation by JB-1, receiving input from an intramural functional "sensory synapse." This was supported by myenteric plexus nicotinic receptor immunohistochemistry. These data offer a novel therapeutic target to modify pathological gut-brain axis activity.-Perez-Burgos, A., Mao, Y.-K., Bienenstock, J., Kunze, W. A. The gut-brain axis rewired: adding a functional vagal nicotinic "sensory synapse."

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.13-245282

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perez‐Burgos, A., Mao, Y., Bienenstock, J., & Kunze, W. A.
Affiliations
  • McMaster Brain‐Body Institute St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton Ontario Canada
  • St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
Corresponding author
Kunze, Wolfgang A.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-09
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
3064-3074
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W1986501752
Cited by
91
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
gut-brain axis, vagal afferents, intrinsic primary afferent neurons, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, synaptic transmission, mesenteric nerves, myenteric plexus, calcium channel blockade, gut microbiota, visceral hypersensitivity
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brain, Jejunum, Male, Neurons, Afferent, Receptors, Nicotinic, Synapses, Vagus Nerve, Mice, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review