Cited by 166Antibiotic Use and ResistanceGut microbiota and healthAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research

Antibiotics in the first year of life and subsequent neurocognitive outcomes

Open access
Slykerman, Rebecca F., Thompson, John, Waldie, Karen E., Murphy, Rinki, Wall, Clare, Mitchell, Edwin A.·2017·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

AIM: There may be a link between disruption to the gut microbiota in early life and later neurocognitive outcomes. We hypothesised that antibiotic use in early life is associated with a detrimental effect on later neurocognitive outcomes. METHODS: Eight hundred and seventy-one European mothers and their children enrolled in the Auckland Birthweight Collaborative Study at birth. Information on antibiotic use during the first year of life and between 12 months and three-and-a-half years of age was gathered via maternal interview. Intelligence test scores and measures of behavioural difficulties were obtained when children were three-and-a-half years, seven years and 11 years of age. RESULTS: Antibiotic use in the first year of life was reported in 70% of the 526 children with antibiotic data assessed at age three-and-a-half years. Those who had received antibiotics had more behavioural difficulties and more symptoms of depression at follow-up. Results were consistent across all standardised psychologist administered tests, as well as parent rated, teacher rated and self-report measures. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates an association between antibiotic use in the first year of life and subsequent neurocognitive outcomes in childhood. If confirmed by further research, these findings could have implications for the use of antibiotics for minor illnesses in infancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apa.13613

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slykerman, R. F., Thompson, J., Waldie, K. E., Murphy, R., Wall, C., & Mitchell, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Slykerman, Rebecca F.
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-12-12
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
87-94
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2529496979
Cited by
166
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
13.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand
  • Cure Kids
  • David and Genevieve Becroft Foundation
  • Auckland Medical Research Foundation
  • National Heart Foundation of New Zealand
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Keywords
antibiotic use, infancy, neuropsychological outcomes, intelligence, behavioral problems, depressive symptoms, gut microbiota, early life exposure, child development, birth weight
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review