Cited by 233Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Lactobacillus fermentum NS9 restores the antibiotic induced physiological and psychological abnormalities in rats

Wang, T., Hu, X., Liang, S., Li, W., Wu, X., Wang, L., Jin, F.·2015·Beneficial Microbes

Abstract

Gut microbiota play a vital role in maintaining the health of the host. Many factors affect gut microbiota; application of broad range antibiotics disturb microbiota, while probiotic application protects the microbiota. To investigate how probiotics alter the physiological and psychological changes induced by antibiotics, we tested the performance of ampicillin-treated rats in the presence or absence of Lactobacillus fermentum strain NS9, in elevated plus maze and Morris water maze. The results showed that NS9 normalised the composition of gut microbiota and alleviated the ampicillin-induced inflammation in the colon. The levels of the mineralocorticoid and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors were also elevated in the hippocampus of the ampillicin+NS9 treated group. NS9 administration also reduced the anxiety-like behaviour and alleviated the ampicillin-induced impairment in memory retention. These findings suggest that NS9 is beneficial to the host, because it restores the physiological and psychological abnormalities induced by ampicillin. Our results highlight how gut contents regulate the brain, and shed light on the clinical applications of probiotics to treat the side effect of antibiotics and mental disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3920/bm2014.0177

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, T., Hu, X., Liang, S., Li, W., Wu, X., Wang, L., & Jin, F.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
Venue
Beneficial Microbes
Published
2015-10-15
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
707-718
ISSN
  • 1876-2883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-2891
OpenAlex
W2099514643
Cited by
233
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
20.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Beneficial Microbes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
probiotics, ampicillin, antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis, gut-brain axis, anxiety-like behavior, memory impairment, hippocampus, mineralocorticoid receptor, NMDA receptor, colonic inflammation, antibiotic adverse effects
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Ampicillin, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Anxiety, Gastroenteritis, Hippocampus, Memory Disorders, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Receptors, Mineralocorticoid, Probiotics, Rats, Limosilactobacillus fermentum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review