Cited by 1Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPrimate Behavior and EcologyNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Juvenile social play and the development of socio-cognitive skills in male rats: Does everyone benefit?

Open access
Ham, Jackson R., Iwaniuk, Andrew N., Pellis, Sergio M.·2026·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Social play during early life is important for brain and behavioral development. In rats, rough-and-tumble play (RTP)-their main form of social play-enhances socio-cognitive flexibility and refines the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) through dendritic pruning. While restricting RTP impairs these outcomes, it remains unclear whether all individuals benefit equally when play opportunities are abundant. To test this, we reared 54 male rats in large social groups from weaning to adulthood, ensuring rich RTP experiences. Despite these conditions, 20.4% later escalated playful encounters into aggression, indicating reduced social competence. These "incompetent" rats did not differ in play frequency or defensive tactics, suggesting similar juvenile RTP exposure. However, their mPFC layer III pyramidal neurons showed larger dendritic arbors and greater distal spine density, consistent with reduced pruning. These neural and behavioral traits parallel those in play-deprived rats, indicating that some individuals fail to gain RTP's socio-cognitive benefits. This variation mirrors patterns in humans, where not all children benefit equally from play-based interventions, underscoring the need to identify early-life predictors and neural mechanisms underlying individual differences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2026.116198

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ham, J. R., Iwaniuk, A. N., & Pellis, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Lethbridge (CA)
Corresponding author
Ham, Jackson R.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-06
Volume
508
Pages
116198
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7153500257
Cited by
1
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs Program (CRC-2018\u201300023)
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation (ANI: 30215)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (2024\u201303978, 2018\u201303706)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
rough-and-tumble play, social play, medial prefrontal cortex, dendritic pruning, individual differences, social aggression, social competence, dendritic spine density, play deprivation
MeSH terms
Social Cognition, Cognitive Flexibility, Aggression, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cognition, Dendrites, Individuality, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Play and Playthings, Social Behavior, Prefrontal Cortex, Pyramidal Cells, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review