Cited by 57Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Play, variation in play and the development of socially competent rats

Himmler, Stephanie M., Himmler, Brett T., Pellis, Vivien C., Pellis, Sergio M.·2016·Behaviour

Abstract

Studies on laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus) have revealed that experience with social play in the juvenile period is important for the development of improved social skills, an improvement that appears to be mediated by the prefrontal cortex. But there is much variation in both the frequency with which play occurs and in the complexity of the actions performed among different strains of rats. Is all this variation adaptive in serving play’s critical developmental role? The integrative approach advocated by Tinbergen provides a framework with which to assess such variation. A review of what is known and the inclusion of some novel data suggest that irrespective of the form of the play, rats of all strains converge on the same key experiences, experiences that have been implicated in the development of social skills. The lessons learnt from rats may serve as a guide for broader cross-species comparisons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/1568539x-00003307

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The social context in which rats are reared is particularly important, as sex differences are most apparent when the rats are reared in mixed-sex groups.

    “The social context in which rats are reared seems to be particularly important, as sex differences are most apparent when the rats are reared in mixed‐sex groups (for a review, see S. M. Himmler et al. 2016).”

    From Partner Choice and Context‐Dependent Sex Differences in Rat Rough‐and‐Tumble Play (2026) · cites this paper as S. M. Himmler et al. 2016

  • Attack and defense during rough-and-tumble play tend to involve independent mechanisms.

    “For instance, attack and defense during RTP tend to involve independent mechanisms (Himmler et al., 2016).”
  • There are differences across rat strains in the relative frequency of nape attacks and in the use of defensive tactics that lead to evading contact or promoting close-quarter wrestling.

    “Similarly, there are differences across strains in the relative frequency of nape attacks and in the use of defensive tactics that lead to evading contact or promoting close-quarter wrestling (Himmler et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Himmler, S. M., Himmler, B. T., Pellis, V. C., & Pellis, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Lethbridge (CA)
Venue
Behaviour
Published
2016
Volume
153
Issue
9-11
Pages
1103-1137
ISSN
  • 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-539X
OpenAlex
W1127676024
Cited by
57
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
10.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
social play, rats, social competence, social skills development, prefrontal cortex, strain differences, integrated approach, Tinbergen, juvenile development, cross-species comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review