Cited by 290Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Reward behaviour is regulated by the strength of hippocampus–nucleus accumbens synapses

Open access
LeGates, Tara A., Kvarta, Mark D., Tooley, Jessica R., Francis, T. Chase, Lobo, Mary Kay, Creed, Meaghan C., Thompson, Scott M.·2018·Nature

Abstract

Reward drives motivated behaviours and is essential for survival, and therefore there is strong evolutionary pressure to retain contextual information about rewarding stimuli. This drive may be abnormally strong, such as in addiction, or weak, such as in depression, in which anhedonia (loss of pleasure in response to rewarding stimuli) is a prominent symptom. Hippocampal input to the shell of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is important for driving NAc activity 1,2 and activity-dependent modulation of the strength of this input may contribute to the proper regulation of goal-directed behaviours. However, there have been few robust descriptions of the mechanisms that underlie the induction or expression of long-term potentiation (LTP) at these synapses, and there is, to our knowledge, no evidence about whether such plasticity contributes to reward-related behaviour. Here we show that high-frequency activity induces LTP at hippocampus-NAc synapses in mice via canonical, but dopamine-independent, mechanisms. The induction of LTP at this synapse in vivo drives conditioned place preference, and activity at this synapse is required for conditioned place preference in response to a natural reward. Conversely, chronic stress, which induces anhedonia, decreases the strength of this synapse and impairs LTP, whereas antidepressant treatment is accompanied by a reversal of these stress-induced changes. We conclude that hippocampus-NAc synapses show activity-dependent plasticity and suggest that their strength may be critical for contextual reward behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0740-8

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the prefrontal cortex, chronic stress affects AMPAR and NMDAR components of EPSPs equally, unlike in the nucleus accumbens and hippocampus.

    “Both AMPAR-and NMDAR-components of the EPSP were equally affected, unlike in the NAc [192,193] and hippocampus [110].”
  • Activity-dependent LTP in vivo was necessary and sufficient to induce a conditioned place preference lasting at least 24 hours.

    “Activity-dependent LTP in vivo was both necessary and sufficient to induce a conditioned place preference lasting for at least 24hrs [193].”
  • High-frequency stimulation of hippocampal afferents to the nucleus accumbens produces a rapid and persistent NMDAR-triggered, Ca2+- and CaMK-dependent increase in postsynaptic AMPAR responses in D1 and D2 medium spiny neurons.

    “Much like canonical hippocampal LTP, high frequency stimulation of hippocampal afferents to the NAc elicits a rapid and persistent NMDAR-triggered, Ca 2+ -and CaMKdependent increase in postsynaptic AMPAR responses in D1 and D2 MSNs [193].”
  • Chronic stress reduces evoked AMPA receptor-mediated excitatory synaptic currents in D1, but not D2, medium spiny neurons, including responses to hippocampal afferents.

    “Similarly, evoked AMPA receptor-mediated excitatory synaptic currents are reduced by chronic stress in D1, but not D2, MSNs [236], including in response to afferents from the hippocampus [193].”
  • Chronic, but not acute, fluoxetine in stressed mice restores hippocampal excitatory synapse strength in D1 medium spiny neurons and their ability to undergo LTP, alongside restored sucrose preference.

    “Chronic, but not acute, administration of fluoxetine to stressed mice restores the strength of hippocampal excitatory synapses in D1 MSNs and their ability to undergo LTP, concomitant with restoration of sucrose preference [193].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeGates, T. A., Kvarta, M. D., Tooley, J. R., Francis, T. C., Lobo, M. K., Creed, M. C., & Thompson, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Scott M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-11-26
Volume
564
Issue
7735
Pages
258-262
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2900803145
Cited by
290
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH106500, R01MH086828)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA038613)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, long-term potentiation, synaptic plasticity, conditioned place preference, anhedonia, chronic stress, antidepressant treatment, goal-directed behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Chronic Disease, Conditioning, Psychological, Dopamine, Female, Goals, Hippocampus, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Nucleus Accumbens, Reward, Stress, Psychological, Synapses, Long-Term Potentiation, Mice, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review