CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Habitual napping moderates motor performance improvements following a short daytime nap

Milner, Catherine E., Fogel, Stuart M., Cote, Kimberly A.·2006·Biological Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.01.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The effect of napping on motor performance was examined in habitual and non-habitual nappers who were randomly assigned to a nap or reading condition. Motor procedural learning and auditory discrimination tasks were administered pre- and post-condition. Both groups reported improved alertness post-nap, but not post-reading. Non-habitual nappers fell asleep faster and tended to have greater sleep efficiency, but did not differ from habitual nappers on other sleep architecture variables. Habitual nappers had greater alpha and theta EEG power in stage 1, and greater delta, alpha and sigma power in stage 2 sleep. Motor performance deteriorated for non-habitual nappers who napped, but improved for all others. The number of sleep spindles and sigma power (13.5-15 Hz) significantly predicted motor performance following the nap, for habitual nappers only. Results indicate that motor learning was consolidated in a brief nap and was associated with stage 2 spindles, but only for those who habitually take naps.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.01.015

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aubrey, 1999, Cognitive and motor procedural tasks are dissociated in REM and stage two sleep, Sleep Research Online, 2, 220
  2. Doran, 2003, The dynamic topography of individual sleep spindles, Sleep Research Online, 5, 133
  3. Fogel, 2001, Increased spindle activity following simple motor procedural learning in humans, Actas de Fisiologia, 7, 123
  4. Horne, 1976, A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness–eveningness, International Journal of Chronobiology, 4, 97
  5. Lawrence, 1972, Afternoon naps of different lengths, Psychophysiology, 9, 133
  6. Smith, 1997, Amount of REM sleep and stage 2 sleep required for efficient learning, Sleep Research, 26, 690
  7. Taub, 1977, Napping behaviour, activation and sleep function, Waking and Sleeping, 1, 281

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Milner, C. E., Fogel, S. M., & Cote, K. A.
Affiliations
Brock University (CA)
ORCID
Fogel, Stuart M.
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
141-156
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.01.015
OpenAlex
W2009769342
Cited by
113
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Brock University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
daytime napping, motor performance, sleep spindles, sigma power, stage 2 sleep, sleep architecture, sleep efficiency, alertness, auditory discrimination, EEG spectral power
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Alpha Rhythm, Arousal, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Circadian Rhythm, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Habits, Humans, Male, Pitch Discrimination, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reading, Sleep, Theta Rhythm, Wakefulness, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review