Cited by 152Memory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nothing is safe: Intolerance of uncertainty is associated with compromised fear extinction learning

Open access
Morriss, Jayne, Christakou, Anastasia, van Reekum, Carien M.·2016·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Extinction-resistant fear is considered to be a central feature of pathological anxiety. Here we sought to determine if individual differences in Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU), a potential risk factor for anxiety disorders, underlies compromised fear extinction. We tested this hypothesis by recording electrodermal activity in 38 healthy participants during fear acquisition and extinction. We assessed the temporality of fear extinction, by examining early and late extinction learning. During early extinction, low IU was associated with larger skin conductance responses to learned threat vs. safety cues, whereas high IU was associated with skin conductance responding to both threat and safety cues, but no cue discrimination. During late extinction, low IU showed no difference in skin conductance between learned threat and safety cues, whilst high IU predicted continued fear expression to learned threat, indexed by larger skin conductance to threat vs. safety cues. These findings suggest a critical role of uncertainty-based mechanisms in the maintenance of learned fear.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.05.001

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Conditioning task design.
Fig. 1 Conditioning task design.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Bar graphs depicting IU estimated at + or − 1 SD of mean IU during early and late fear extinction learning. Low IU scores were associated with significantly greater SCR magnitude responses to CS+ vs. CS− in early extinction, and no differences between stimuli in late extinction, suggesting typical fear expression and extinction respectively. High IU scores were associated with no SCR magnitude discrimination between CS+ and CS− in early extinction, but did show SCR magnitude discrimination between CS+ and CS− in late extinction, as well as a reduction in SCR magnitude to CS− in early vs. late extinction, suggesting threat generalization and compromised safety learning. Square root transformed SCR magnitude (√mS), skin conductance magnitude measured in microSiemens. Standard error bars represent standard error estimated a + or − 1 SD of mean IU.
Fig. 2 Bar graphs depicting IU estimated at + or − 1 SD of mean IU during early and late fear extinction learning. Low IU scores were associated with significantly greater SCR magnitude responses to CS+ vs. CS− in early extinction, and no differences between stimuli in late extinction, suggesting typical fear expression and extinction respectively. High IU scores were associated with no SCR magnitude discrimination between CS+ and CS− in early extinction, but did show SCR magnitude discrimination between CS+ and CS− in late extinction, as well as a reduction in SCR magnitude to CS− in early vs. late extinction, suggesting threat generalization and compromised safety learning. Square root transformed SCR magnitude (√mS), skin conductance magnitude measured in microSiemens. Standard error bars represent standard error estimated a + or − 1 SD of mean IU.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P., & Jacobs, G. (1983). Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. 2».

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 152

Metadata

Authors
Morriss, J., Christakou, A., & van Reekum, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
121
Issue
Pt B
Pages
187-193
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2378955611
Cited by
152
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics (MR/J003980/1)
  • Natalia Kontoudaki & Karolina Tokarska for their help in collecting the data
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, fear extinction, fear acquisition, anxiety disorders, skin conductance response, electrodermal activity, cue discrimination, individual differences
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Arousal, Autonomic Nervous System, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Risk Factors, Safety, Uncertainty, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review