Cited by 333Algal biology and biofuel productionPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

A biorefinery from Nannochloropsis sp. microalga – Extraction of oils and pigments. Production of biohydrogen from the leftover biomass

Open access
Nobre, B.P., Villalobos, F., Barragán, B.E., Oliveira, A.C., Batista, A.P., Marques, P.A.S.S., Mendes, R.L., Sovová, H. +2 more·2013·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

The microalga Nannochloropsis sp. was used in this study, in a biorefinery context, as biomass feedstock for the production of fatty acids for biodiesel, biohydrogen and high added-value compounds. The microalgal biomass, which has a high lipid and pigment content (mainly carotenoids), was submitted to supercritical CO2 extraction. The temperature, pressure and solvent flow-rate were evaluated to check their effect on the extraction yield. The best operational conditions to extract 33 g lipids/100 g dry biomass were found to be at 40 °C, 300 bar and a CO2 flow-rate of 0.62 g/min. The effect of adding a co-solvent (ethanol) was also studied. When supercritical CO2 doped with 20% (w/w) ethanol was used, it was possible to extract 45 g lipids/100 g dry biomass of lipids and recover 70% of the pigments. Furthermore, the remaining biomass after extraction was effectively used as feedstock to produce biohydrogen through dark fermentation by Enterobacter aerogenes resulting in a hydrogen production yield of 60.6 mL/g dry biomass.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.084

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nobre, B. P., Villalobos, F., Barragán, B. E., Oliveira, A. C., Batista, A. P., Marques, P. A. S. S., Mendes, R. L., Sovová, H., Palavra, A. F., & Gouveia, L.
Affiliations
  • National Laboratory of Energy and Geology (PT)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals (CZ)
Corresponding author
Gouveia, L.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
135
Pages
128-136
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053806498
Cited by
333
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ASEP (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
Nannochloropsis, microalgae, biorefinery, supercritical CO2 extraction, lipid extraction, carotenoid extraction, ethanol co-solvent, biodiesel feedstock, biohydrogen, dark fermentation, Enterobacter aerogenes, microalgal biomass valorization
MeSH terms
Biotechnology, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Fermentation, Hydrogen, Lipids, Oils, Pigments, Biological, Solvents, Biomass, Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid, Biofuels, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review