Cited by 179Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory Processes and Influences

Attentional biases in PTSD: more evidence for interference

Pineles, Suzanne L., Shipherd, Jillian C., Mostoufi, Sheeva M., Abramovitz, Sarah M., Yovel, Iftah·2009·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Attentional biases to trauma-related stimuli have been widely demonstrated in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, the majority of these studies used methods not suited to differentiating difficulty disengaging attention from threatening stimuli (interference) from facilitated detection of threat. In the current study, a visual search task (VST) with a lexical decision component was used to differentiate between attentional interference and facilitation. Forty-six sexual assault survivors with High PTSD or Low PTSD symptoms completed the VST with three types of stimuli (trauma-related, general threat-related, and semantically-related neutral words), to examine the specificity of attentional biases associated with PTSD symptoms. High PTSD participants showed increased interference to trauma-related words relative to Low PTSD participants. Furthermore, the increased attentional interference in High PTSD participants was specific to trauma-related stimuli. No evidence was found for facilitated detection of threatening stimuli in PTSD. These results provide additional support for attentional biases in PTSD relating to attentional interference with trauma-related cues rather than facilitated detection of threat. The implications for this pattern of results are discussed in relation to anxiety disorders that are characterized by rumination and/or intrusions (e.g., PTSD, GAD) rather than those more circumscribed to fight or flight response (e.g., phobias).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2009.08.001

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A well-replicated finding in the PTSD literature is disrupted cognitive control in individuals with PTSD, evidenced by greater distractibility from task-irrelevant stimuli and difficulty inhibiting responses to task-irrelevant stimuli.

    “A well-replicated finding in the PTSD literature is that of disrupted cognitive control in individuals with PTSD, evidenced by greater distractibility from task irrelevant stimuli and difficulty inhibiting responses to task irrelevant stimuli”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pineles, S. L., Shipherd, J. C., Mostoufi, S. M., Abramovitz, S. M., & Yovel, I.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Pineles, Suzanne L.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
47
Issue
12
Pages
1050-1057
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989977478
Cited by
179
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, attentional bias, attentional interference, threat detection, sexual assault survivors, visual search task, lexical decision, rumination, generalized anxiety disorder, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Attention, Attitude, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Sex Offenses, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review