Cited by 48Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Working with parents to treat anxiety-disordered children: A proof of concept RCT evaluating Fear-less Triple P

Cobham, Vanessa E., Filus, Ania, Sanders, Matthew R.·2017·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Little is known about the efficacy of parent-only interventions and the maintenance of gains over time with anxiety-disordered children and adolescents. The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a 6-session parent-focused intervention (Fear-less Triple P) in reducing children's anxiety symptomatology. The parents of 61 anxiety-disordered children (7-14 years) were randomly assigned to either the 6-session parent-only group CBT intervention or a wait-list control (WL) group. Diagnostic and questionnaire measures were administered at post-treatment; as well as 3-, 6- and 12 months following the completion of treatment. Families in the WL group were re-assessed after 6 weeks (the duration of the active intervention) and were then offered the intervention. The parent-only intervention produced superior outcomes for children on diagnostic and questionnaire measures. The percentages of children free of any anxiety diagnosis following the intervention were 38.7% (post-treatment); 58.6% (3-mth); 69.2% (6-mth); and 84% (12-mth). At the post-treatment assessment point, 3.4% of children in the WL group were free of any anxiety diagnosis. Mother and child questionnaire measures demonstrated gains from pre to post-treatment that were maintained over time. This proof of concept study suggests that the brief, parent-only intervention evaluated is an efficacious treatment approach for child anxiety disorders. A parent-only, group CBT intervention such as the one described here offers a cost-effective, low intensity alternative to traditional child-focused interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2017.06.004

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cobham, V. E., Filus, A., & Sanders, M. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Cobham, Vanessa E.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
95
Pages
128-138
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2624837124
Cited by
48
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Queensland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
childhood anxiety disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy, parent training, maintenance of treatment gains, brief intervention, cost-effective treatment, child and adolescent mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Parenting, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review