Cited by 367Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild Therapy and Development

Cognitive-Behavioral Group Treatments in Childhood Anxiety Disorders: The Role of Parental Involvement

MENDLOWITZ, SANDRA L., MANASSIS, KATHARINA, BRADLEY, SUSAN, SCAPILLATO, DONNA, MIEZITIS, SOLVEIGA, SHAW, BRIAN E·1999·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives This study examined (1) the effect of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention on anxiety, depression, and coping strategies in school-age children (aged 7-12 years) with Axis I anxiety disorders; and (2) the effect of parental involvement on treatment outcomes.Method Parents and children (N = 62) were randomly assigned to one of three 12-week treatment conditions: parent and child intervention, child-only intervention, and parent-only intervention. Child anxiety, depression, and coping strategies were assessed before and after treatment.Results All treatment groups reported fewer symptoms of anxiety and depression posttreatment and changes in their use of coping strategies. Children in the parent and child intervention used more active coping strategies posttreatment compared with children in the other 2 treatment conditions. Parents in this treatment condition reported a significantly greater improvement in their children's emotional well-being than parents in the other treatment conditions.Conclusions Cognitive-behavioral group interventions reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression in school-age children with anxiety disorders. Concurrent parental involvement enhanced the effect on coping strategies. Further investigation is needed to corroborate the effectiveness of such short-term interventions and the maintenance of treatment effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-199910000-00010

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MENDLOWITZ, S. L., MANASSIS, K., BRADLEY, S., SCAPILLATO, D., MIEZITIS, S., & SHAW, B. E.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
MENDLOWITZ, SANDRA L.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-10
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
1223-1229
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082066759
Cited by
365
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
15.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
group cognitive behavioral therapy, childhood anxiety disorders, parental involvement, parent-child intervention, childhood depression, coping strategies, elementary school students, treatment outcomes, emotional well-being
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Depression, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review